Kokiwar Prashant Ramdas, Nikitha P
Department of Community Medicine, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Community Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;45(1):32-35. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_134_19.
Learning about menstrual hygiene is vital part of health education for adolescent girls so that they can continue to work and maintain hygienic habits throughout their adult life.
The aim is to study the efficacy of focused group discussion (FGD) in comparison to didactic lecture method (DL) on knowledge and practices related to menstruation among adolescent girls of rural areas.
Community-based interventional study was carried out among 260 adolescent girls. Knowledge and practice were assessed with the help of questionnaire preintervention. During intervention, 130 girls in DL group were given DL and 130 girls in FGD received FGD. After 2 months, all 260 girls were contacted. Their knowledge and practices were assessed using same questionnaire.
Yates corrected Chi-square and Student's -test was used.
Both methods were equally effective in increasing mean knowledge and practices score ( < 0.05). On comparison of mean postintervention scores between the two groups for knowledge, the FGD method was found to be superior ( < 0.05) but not for practices ( > 0.05).
FGD was more effective than DL method for knowledge related to menstruation but not for practices.
了解经期卫生是青春期女孩健康教育的重要组成部分,以便她们在成年后能够继续工作并保持卫生习惯。
旨在研究与讲授法(DL)相比,焦点小组讨论(FGD)对农村地区青春期女孩月经相关知识和行为的影响。
对260名青春期女孩开展基于社区的干预性研究。干预前借助问卷评估知识和行为。干预期间,DL组的130名女孩接受讲授法,FGD组的130名女孩接受焦点小组讨论。2个月后,联系所有260名女孩。使用相同问卷评估她们的知识和行为。
采用Yates校正卡方检验和t检验。
两种方法在提高平均知识和行为得分方面同样有效(P<0.05)。两组干预后知识的平均得分比较,发现FGD方法更优(P<0.05),但行为方面并非如此(P>0.05)。
FGD在月经相关知识方面比DL方法更有效,但在行为方面并非如此。