Suppr超能文献

非海洋软体动物DNA提取方法的比较:改良CTAB DNA提取方法比DNA提取试剂盒更高效吗?

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for non-marine molluscs: is modified CTAB DNA extraction method more efficient than DNA extraction kits?

作者信息

Chakraborty Sudeshna, Saha Anwesha, Neelavar Ananthram Aravind

机构信息

1Suri Sehgal Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Sriramapura, Jakkur PO, Bangalore, 560064 India.

2Present Address: Institute of Paleobiology, Polska Akademia Nauk, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

3 Biotech. 2020 Feb;10(2):69. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-2051-7. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Abstract

Isolation of high molecular weight DNA from gastropod molluscs and its subsequent PCR amplification is considered difficult due to excessive mucopolysaccharides secretion which co-precipitate with DNA and obstruct successful amplification. In an attempt to address this issue, we describe a modified CTAB DNA extraction method that proved to work significantly better with a number of freshwater and terrestrial gastropod taxa. We compared the performance of this method with Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit. Reproducibility of amplification was verified using a set of taxon-specific primers, wherein modified CTAB extracted DNA could be replicated at least four out of five times but kit extracted DNA could not be replicated. In addition, sequence quality was significantly better with CTAB extracted DNA. This could be attributed to the removal of polyphenolic compounds by polyvinyl pyrrolidone which is the only difference between conventional and modified CTAB DNA extraction methods for animals. The genomic DNA isolated using modified CTAB protocol was of high quality (A260/280 ≥ 1.80) and could be used for downstream reactions even after long-term storage (more than 2 years).

摘要

从腹足纲软体动物中分离高分子量DNA及其后续的PCR扩增被认为是困难的,因为过多的粘多糖会与DNA共沉淀并阻碍成功扩增。为了解决这个问题,我们描述了一种改良的CTAB DNA提取方法,该方法在许多淡水和陆生腹足纲分类群中被证明效果显著更好。我们将该方法的性能与Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit进行了比较。使用一组分类群特异性引物验证了扩增的可重复性,其中改良CTAB提取的DNA在五次中有至少四次可以复制,但试剂盒提取的DNA无法复制。此外,CTAB提取的DNA的序列质量明显更好。这可能归因于聚乙烯吡咯烷酮去除了多酚类化合物,这是传统和改良的动物CTAB DNA提取方法之间的唯一区别。使用改良CTAB方案分离的基因组DNA质量很高(A260/280≥1.80),即使长期保存(超过2年)后也可用于下游反应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data.贝叶斯物种界定法:使用多位点序列数据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9264-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913022107. Epub 2010 May 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验