• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下腓骨支持带修复术治疗复发性腓骨肌腱脱位,可使患者更早恢复运动,优于开放手术。

Tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair for recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation enables earlier return to sports than the open procedure.

机构信息

Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.

Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3318-3323. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05877-x. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-020-05877-x
PMID:32030502
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair for patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation (RPTD) is more useful than an open procedure.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with RPTD were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients (13 ankles) with RPTD underwent the open procedure (Group A) between 2008 and 2014, and 13 patients (14 ankles) underwent the tendoscopic procedure (Group B) between 2014 and 2017. Evaluation parameters included clinical results [the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle-hind foot scale], operation time, complications, return to sports, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Postoperative JSSF ankle/hindfoot scale scores were significantly better than the pre-surgical scores in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in Group B than in Group A (75.7 ± 20.5 vs 38.4 ± 10.5 min). There was one recurrence in Group A, but none in Group B. Group A had no complications, and Group B had one wound infection. Group B, excluding the case of infection, could return to sports earlier than Group A, excluding the recurrent case (13.4 ± 1.5 vs 12.2 ± 0.6 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

This tendoscopic procedure needs longer operation time and is more technically demanding, but it is a useful procedure, because it is less invasive and can accelerate return to sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估对于复发性外踝肌腱脱位(RPTD)患者,经皮内窥镜下腓骨支持带修复是否优于开放式手术。

方法

回顾性分析 25 例 RPTD 患者。2008 年至 2014 年间,12 例(13 足)患者接受开放式手术(A 组),2014 年至 2017 年间,13 例(14 足)患者接受经皮内窥镜下手术(B 组)。评估参数包括临床结果(日本足踝外科协会[JSSF]踝关节-后足评分)、手术时间、并发症、重返运动和复发。

结果

两组患者术后 JSSF 踝关节/后足评分均明显优于术前。B 组的平均手术时间明显长于 A 组(75.7±20.5 比 38.4±10.5 分钟)。A 组有 1 例复发,B 组无复发。A 组无并发症,B 组有 1 例伤口感染。B 组(感染除外)比 A 组(复发除外)更早重返运动(13.4±1.5 比 12.2±0.6 周)。

结论

该经皮内窥镜下手术需要更长的手术时间和更高的技术要求,但它是一种有用的手术方法,因为它的侵入性更小,可以加速重返运动。

证据等级

III。

相似文献

1
Tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair for recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation enables earlier return to sports than the open procedure.关节镜下腓骨支持带修复术治疗复发性腓骨肌腱脱位,可使患者更早恢复运动,优于开放手术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3318-3323. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05877-x. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum versus the bone block procedure for the treatment of recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation: two safe and effective techniques.修复上支持带与骨块固定术治疗复发性外踝肌腱脱位:两种安全有效的技术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Sep;27(9):2877-2883. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05479-2. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Comparison of Outcome After Retinaculum Repair With and Without Fibular Groove Deepening for Recurrent Dislocation of the Peroneal Tendons.腓骨肌腱复发性脱位时,有或无加深腓骨沟的支持带修复术后疗效比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Jul;35(7):683-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100714531233. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
4
Posterior Fibular Groove Deepening Procedure With Low-Profile Screw Fixation of Fibrocartilaginous Flap for Chronic Peroneal Tendon Dislocation.采用低轮廓螺钉固定纤维软骨瓣的后腓骨沟加深术治疗慢性腓骨肌腱脱位
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 May-Jun;57(3):478-483. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Return to sports and clinical outcomes in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocation: a systematic review.腓骨肌腱脱位患者恢复运动情况及临床结局:一项系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1155-64. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3833-z. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
6
Tendoscopic treatment of recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation.经内镜治疗复发性腓肠肌腱脱位。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jun;21(6):1304-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2121-4. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
7
Knotless Tendoscopic Peroneal Retinaculum Repair Technique for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation.用于复发性腓骨肌腱脱位的无结关节镜下腓骨支持带修复技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Jul 14;11(8):e1395-e1401. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.03.028. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Treatment of Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation by Peroneal Retinaculum Reattachment Without Fibular Groove Deepening.腓骨肌腱沟不加深的腓骨肌腱支持带修复治疗复发性腓骨肌腱脱位
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Sep-Oct;60(5):994-997. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.04.027. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
9
Tendoscopic Treatment of Peroneal Intrasheath Subluxation: A New Subgroup With Superior Peroneal Retinaculum Injury.关节镜下治疗腓骨肌腱鞘内半脱位:一种伴有腓骨上支持带损伤的新亚组。
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 May;39(5):542-550. doi: 10.1177/1071100718764674. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
10
A new peroneal tendon rerouting method to treat recurrent dislocation of peroneal tendons.一种治疗腓骨肌腱复发性脱位的新型腓骨肌腱改道方法。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):552-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546508325924. Epub 2008 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation-the current concept of management.复发性腓骨肌腱脱位——当前的治疗理念
Ann Jt. 2024 Aug 30;9:40. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-10. eCollection 2024.
2
Knotless Tendoscopic Peroneal Retinaculum Repair Technique for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation.用于复发性腓骨肌腱脱位的无结关节镜下腓骨支持带修复技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Jul 14;11(8):e1395-e1401. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.03.028. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
In-Office Needle Tendoscopy of the Peroneal Tendons.腓骨肌腱的门诊针式关节镜检查
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Feb 8;11(3):e365-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.11.002. eCollection 2022 Mar.