College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Division of Genetics Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1162-1171. doi: 10.1111/jan.14317. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
To construct a model addressing the pathways from baseline diabetes distress, attribution of peer reactions, parenting style and 3-month self-management to 6-month glycated haemoglobin levels in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
A prospective design was adopted.
A total of 177 adolescents aged 10-19 with type 1 diabetes were enrolled from four hospitals in Taiwan. Diabetes distress, attribution of peer reactions and parenting style were collected at baseline, self-management was collected at the third month and glycated haemoglobin levels were collected at the sixth month. Data were collected from May 2015-June 2016.
Baseline diabetes distress and 3-month self-management directly affected 6-month glycated haemoglobin levels. Baseline attribution of peer reactions directly affected baseline diabetes distress and 3-month self-management; also, it indirectly affected 6-month glycated haemoglobin levels through 3-month self-management. Baseline parenting style directly affected baseline diabetes distress, baseline attribution of peer reactions, 3-month self-management and 6-month glycated haemoglobin levels; it also indirectly affected 6-month glycated haemoglobin levels through baseline diabetes distress and 3-month self-management.
A model simultaneously incorporating individual, parental and peer factors to glycaemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes has been constructed. Improving diabetes distress and self-management should be essential strategies to improve glycaemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Encouraging adolescents with type 1 diabetes to communicate openly with peers about diabetes care and educating their parents to provide more responsive and autonomy-encouraging parenting style might be vital strategies to improve diabetes distress, 3-month self-management and glycaemic control.
Individual, parental and peer factors should be simultaneously considered to improve glycaemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Nurses should evaluate these factors to tailor interventions improving glycaemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
构建一个模型,探讨从基线糖尿病困扰、同伴反应归因、养育方式和 3 个月自我管理到青少年 1 型糖尿病 6 个月糖化血红蛋白水平的途径。
采用前瞻性设计。
从台湾的四家医院招募了 177 名年龄在 10-19 岁的 1 型糖尿病青少年。在基线时收集糖尿病困扰、同伴反应归因和养育方式,在第三个月收集自我管理,在第六个月收集糖化血红蛋白水平。数据收集于 2015 年 5 月至 2016 年 6 月。
基线糖尿病困扰和 3 个月自我管理直接影响 6 个月糖化血红蛋白水平。基线同伴反应归因直接影响基线糖尿病困扰和 3 个月自我管理;也通过 3 个月自我管理间接影响 6 个月糖化血红蛋白水平。基线养育方式直接影响基线糖尿病困扰、基线同伴反应归因、3 个月自我管理和 6 个月糖化血红蛋白水平;也通过基线糖尿病困扰和 3 个月自我管理间接影响 6 个月糖化血红蛋白水平。
构建了一个同时包含个体、父母和同伴因素对青少年 1 型糖尿病血糖控制的模型。改善糖尿病困扰和自我管理应该是改善青少年 1 型糖尿病血糖控制的重要策略。鼓励青少年 1 型糖尿病患者与同伴就糖尿病护理进行公开沟通,教育他们的父母提供更有反应和鼓励自主性的养育方式,可能是改善糖尿病困扰、3 个月自我管理和血糖控制的重要策略。
个体、父母和同伴因素应同时考虑,以改善青少年 1 型糖尿病的血糖控制。护士应评估这些因素,以制定改善青少年 1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的干预措施。