Zannoni Letizia, Ambrosio Marco, Raimondo Diego, Arena Alessandro, Del Forno Simona, Borghese Giulia, Paradisi Roberto, Seracchioli Renato
Department of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Pathophysiology, Saint'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jul;39(7):1405-1412. doi: 10.1002/jum.15237. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the classic ultrasound (US) signs of adenomyosis, the question mark sign and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) uterine tenderness, in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
This was a prospective study including 78 patients waiting for hysterectomy for uterine benign diseases and undergoing preoperative US examinations to evaluate all criteria for US diagnosis of adenomyosis as reported by the consensus statement of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group. A US diagnosis of adenomyosis was made in the presence of 2 or more Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment features. Moreover, the question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness were evaluated. Ultrasound features were compared with the histologic examination, which was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The Cohen κ coefficient was used to measure the accordance between US and histologic results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each US feature were calculated.
The prevalence of adenomyosis in the sample was 33.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVUS in the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 77%, 96%, 91%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. Myometrial heterogeneity was the most frequently encountered feature (100%) but showed low specificity (7%). The question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 41%, 96%, 83%, 77%, and 69% and 69%, 65%, 66%, 81%, and 67%.
The question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness are useful tools for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
评估子宫腺肌病的经典超声(US)征象——问号征及经阴道超声(TVUS)子宫压痛在子宫腺肌病诊断中的诊断准确性。
这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了78例因子宫良性疾病等待子宫切除术且术前行超声检查以评估形态学子宫超声评估组共识声明中所报告的子宫腺肌病超声诊断所有标准的患者。当存在2个或更多形态学子宫超声评估特征时,作出子宫腺肌病的超声诊断。此外,对问号征和TVUS子宫压痛进行评估。将超声特征与组织学检查结果进行比较,组织学检查被视为子宫腺肌病诊断的参考标准。采用Cohen κ系数测量超声与组织学结果之间的一致性。计算每个超声特征的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)及准确性。
样本中子宫腺肌病的患病率为33.3%。TVUS诊断子宫腺肌病的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV及准确性分别为77%、96%、91%、89%和90%。肌层异质性是最常出现的特征(100%),但特异性较低(7%)。问号征和TVUS子宫压痛的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV及准确性分别为41%、96%、83%、77%和69%以及69%、65%、66%、81%和67%。
问号征和TVUS子宫压痛是诊断子宫腺肌病的有用工具。