Suppr超能文献

长期分割小区现场试验中效应大小的时间变化。

Temporal variation in effect sizes in a long-term, split-plot field experiment.

机构信息

Division of Ecology and Evolution, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.

Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Ecology. 2020 Jun;101(6):e03009. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3009. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

Abstract

Ecological field experiments initiate successional and evolutionary changes among resident species, yet effect sizes are often reported as if they were constants. Few ecological studies have addressed their questions through long-term, experimental approaches, and many questions remain unanswered regarding temporal patterns in ecological effect sizes. We document temporal variation in effect sizes in response to pulse and press manipulations in a long-term factorial field experiment at Nash's Field, England. The experiment comprises seven treatments applied in a split-plot design to test the single and interactive effects of herbivory by insects, molluscs, and rabbits, liming, nutrient limitation (applied as press experiments), competition (exclusion of grasses or herbs with specific herbicides), and seed limitation (pulse experiments) on plant community dynamics. The response of all vascular plant species was followed for two decades. High species richness was positively related to the minus-grass herbicide in the first decade and negatively related to both nitrogen addition and the abundance of dominant species in both decades. Many significant effects appeared quickly, but some large effects were not detected until year 15. Press experiments produced some long-lasting effects, but effect sizes changed due to both idiosyncratic "year effects" and secular trends. For pulse experiments, most effects, including positive and negative responses to herbicide application and the invasion of most of the sown species, disappeared quickly. However, some endured or grew monotonically, such as the invasion of two sown species that benefited from particular combinations of the press treatments. The fastest effects to appear were the responses from established species. Many of these responses were negative, likely resulting from reduced niche dimensionality and competitive exclusion by new dominant species. Contrarily, one of the largest community-level effects took well over a decade to appear: the natural invasion by one species, which responded to a four-way interaction between experimental treatments. The insights gained from individual effects increased with the duration of the lag before their first appearance, drawing attention to the importance of long-term, manipulative field experiments. This experiment also reinforces the point that factorial experiments are the most insightful way to explore ecological interactions.

摘要

生态野外实验会引发定居物种的演替和进化变化,但效应大小通常被报告为常数。很少有生态研究通过长期的实验方法来解决这些问题,并且关于生态效应大小的时间模式仍然存在许多未解之谜。我们记录了在英国纳什菲尔德进行的一项长期析因野外实验中,对脉冲和压力处理的响应中效应大小的时间变化。该实验包括七种处理方法,采用裂区设计,以测试昆虫、软体动物和兔子的取食、石灰处理、养分限制(作为压力实验施加)、竞争(用特定除草剂排除草或草本植物)和种子限制(脉冲实验)对植物群落动态的单一和交互影响。在二十年的时间里,我们跟踪了所有维管束植物物种的反应。高物种丰富度与第一个十年中的除草药剂呈正相关,与氮添加和两个十年中的优势物种丰度呈负相关。许多显著的影响很快就出现了,但有些大的影响直到第 15 年才被发现。压力实验产生了一些持久的影响,但由于特殊的“年份效应”和长期趋势,效应大小发生了变化。对于脉冲实验,大多数效应,包括除草剂施用的正、负响应以及大多数播种物种的入侵,很快就消失了。然而,一些效应持续或单调增长,例如受益于压力处理特定组合的两种播种物种的入侵。出现最快的效应是已建立物种的响应。这些响应中的许多是负面的,可能是由于新的优势物种减少了生态位维度和竞争排斥所致。相反,最大的社区级效应之一需要十多年的时间才能显现:一种自然入侵的物种,它对实验处理的四向相互作用做出响应。从个别效应中获得的见解随着首次出现之前的滞后时间的延长而增加,这引起了人们对长期、操纵性野外实验的重要性的关注。该实验还再次强调了析因实验是探索生态相互作用的最有洞察力的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验