Neal Kevin M, Osterbur Todd A, Kiebzak Gary M
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nemours Children's Specialty Care, Jacksonville, FL.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Riley Children's Hospital, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Aug;40(7):329-333. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001519.
Repeat intervention for pediatric forearm fractures after closed manipulation is as high as 46% with flexed elbow (FE) long-arm casts. Casting with the elbow extended (EE) has been advocated as an alternative technique. We documented outcomes of patients treated with closed manipulation and casting with EE long-arm casts for displaced, diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures.
We retrospectively reviewed charts for patients who had sedated manipulations and casting for closed, diaphyseal forearm fractures. Open fractures, immediate surgical intervention, metabolic bone disease, recurrent fractures, and Monteggia injuries were excluded. Closed manipulations were performed by orthopaedic residents assisted by cast technicians, with sedation provided by emergency department physicians. Radiographic angulation and displacement of the radius and ulna on immediate postreduction radiographs and all follow-up radiographs were recorded. Patients requiring repeat intervention were compared with those who did not by using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests.
Of 86 patients (7.2±2.8 y) available for analysis, 82 (95.3%) completed treatment after a single-sedated manipulation and placement of an EE long-arm cast. There were no malunions or nonunions. The average follow-up was 50 days. Four (4.7%) patients required repeat interventions (2 had surgery, 1 had a repeat sedated manipulation, and 1 had a nonsedated manipulation). There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, laterality, fracture position in the diaphysis, or immediate postreduction angulation of the radius or ulna. A literature review showed average repeat intervention rates of 14.9% (range, 0% to 45.9%) for FE casts and 3.3% (range, 0% to 15%) for EE casts.
There was a low rate of repeat interventions (4.7%) in patients with EE casts compared with historical rates for FE casts. Improving the quality of health care involves identifying and implementing practices that provide the best outcomes at the lowest costs. The use of EE long-arm casts following closed manipulation of pediatric forearm fractures may decrease the rate of repeat manipulation or surgery compared with conventional FE casts.
Level IV-case series.
小儿前臂骨折闭合复位后采用屈肘(FE)长臂石膏固定的再次干预率高达46%。有人主张采用伸肘(EE)石膏固定作为一种替代技术。我们记录了采用闭合复位及EE长臂石膏固定治疗小儿骨干双骨折移位的患者的治疗结果。
我们回顾性分析了接受镇静下闭合复位及石膏固定治疗骨干前臂骨折患者的病历。排除开放性骨折、即刻手术干预、代谢性骨病、复发性骨折和孟氏骨折。闭合复位由骨科住院医师在石膏技师协助下进行,镇静由急诊科医生提供。记录复位后即刻及所有随访X线片上桡骨和尺骨的成角和移位情况。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和Fisher精确检验对需要再次干预的患者与未需要再次干预的患者进行比较。
在可供分析的86例患者(7.2±2.8岁)中,82例(95.3%)在单次镇静下复位并放置EE长臂石膏后完成治疗。无畸形愈合或骨不连。平均随访50天。4例(4.7%)患者需要再次干预(2例接受手术,1例接受再次镇静下复位,1例接受非镇静下复位)。年龄、性别、骨折侧别、骨干骨折位置或复位后即刻桡骨或尺骨的成角在统计学上无显著差异。文献综述显示,FE石膏固定的平均再次干预率为14.9%(范围0%至45.9%),EE石膏固定为3.3%(范围0%至15%)。
与FE石膏固定的历史发生率相比,EE石膏固定患者的再次干预率较低(4.7%)。改善医疗质量涉及识别和实施以最低成本提供最佳结果的实践。小儿前臂骨折闭合复位后使用EE长臂石膏固定与传统FE石膏固定相比,可能会降低再次复位或手术的发生率。
IV级——病例系列。