Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lancet HIV. 2020 Mar;7(3):e201-e208. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30346-7. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
In the HIV pandemic, cisgender (ie, non-transgender) men with transgender partners are an underserved population. Complexities of sexuality and gender affect HIV vulnerability for this group, including not identifying with conventional sexual orientation categories (eg, bisexual, heterosexual, or gay) and having attractions based on gender role or expression rather than genital anatomy. Only one HIV prevention interventional study in this population was identified, and one study that assessed the perceived acceptability of an intervention. We found no data for interventions using pre-exposure prophylaxis, interventions for cisgender men with transgender men partners, or cisgender men with casual or transactional sexual partnerships with transgender people. Cisgender men with transgender partners are not easily categorised using traditional HIV risk categories. Additional research is needed to understand stigma and other structural drivers of HIV vulnerability, sexual networks and practices, substance use patterns, and biomedical prevention interest and uptake for this group. Studies that use an intersectional lens and syndemic framework could offer key insights.
在 HIV 大流行中,跨性别者(即非跨性别者)的异性恋伴侣是一个服务不足的群体。性和性别问题的复杂性影响了这一群体的 HIV 易感性,包括不认同传统的性取向类别(如双性恋、异性恋或同性恋),而是基于性别角色或表达而不是生殖器解剖结构产生吸引力。在这一人群中,只确定了一项艾滋病毒预防干预研究,以及一项评估干预措施可接受性的研究。我们没有发现使用暴露前预防措施的干预措施、针对与跨性别男性有伴侣关系的顺性别男性的干预措施,或针对与跨性别者有偶然或交易性性伙伴关系的顺性别男性的干预措施的数据。使用传统的 HIV 风险类别很难对跨性别伴侣的顺性别男性进行分类。需要开展更多研究,以了解这一群体的 HIV 易感性、性网络和性行为、物质使用模式以及生物医学预防的兴趣和接受程度方面的耻辱感和其他结构性驱动因素。使用交叉视角和综合征框架的研究可以提供关键的见解。