• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜下剥离术联合双夹及橡皮圈牵引治疗内镜黏膜切除术后残余或局部复发的结肠病变。

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with double clip and rubber band traction for residual or locally recurrent colonic lesions after previous endoscopic mucosal resection.

机构信息

Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2020 May;52(5):383-388. doi: 10.1055/a-1104-5210. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1055/a-1104-5210
PMID:32032969
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of residual or locally recurrent (RLR) colonic lesions after previous endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an attractive but challenging technique. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESD with double clip and rubber band traction (DCT-ESD) of RLR colonic lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive DCT-ESD procedures for RLR colonic lesions (rectum excluded) performed in two French centers. The frequency of en bloc and R0 resections, procedure speed, additional surgery, and complications were evaluated. R0 resection was also used to investigate the learning curve.

RESULTS

Among the 53 resections, 49 (92.5 %) were performed en bloc and 42 (79.2 %) achieved R0. The median procedure speed was 21 mm/min. There were four (7.5 %) intraoperative perforations and one delayed bleeding; these were successfully treated endoscopically. There was no salvage surgery for complications. The R0 rate increased from 16/26 (61.5 %) for the first 26 procedures to 26/27 (96.3 %,  = 0.002) for the last 27 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

DCT-ESD appears to be a safe and effective treatment for RLR colonic lesions after EMR.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)后残余或局部复发(RLR)的结肠病变是一种有吸引力但具有挑战性的技术。本研究旨在评估双夹和橡胶带牵引(DCT-ESD)治疗 RLR 结肠病变的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在法国的两个中心进行的所有连续的 DCT-ESD 治疗 RLR 结肠病变(排除直肠)的手术。评估了整块和 R0 切除的频率、手术速度、额外手术和并发症。还使用 R0 切除来研究学习曲线。

结果

在 53 例切除术中,49 例(92.5%)整块切除,42 例(79.2%)达到 R0。中位手术速度为 21mm/min。有 4 例(7.5%)术中穿孔和 1 例延迟出血,均经内镜成功治疗。无并发症行挽救性手术。R0 率从第 1 至 26 例的 16/26(61.5%)增加到第 27 例的 26/27(96.3%,=0.002)。

结论

DCT-ESD 似乎是治疗 EMR 后 RLR 结肠病变的一种安全有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with double clip and rubber band traction for residual or locally recurrent colonic lesions after previous endoscopic mucosal resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合双夹及橡皮圈牵引治疗内镜黏膜切除术后残余或局部复发的结肠病变。
Endoscopy. 2020 May;52(5):383-388. doi: 10.1055/a-1104-5210. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
2
Double-clip traction for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study of 599 consecutive cases (with video).双夹牵引在结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用:599 例连续病例的多中心研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug;94(2):333-343. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.036. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Effectiveness of Inner Traction-Facilitated Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using Rubber Band and Clips for Colorectal Neoplasms: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.采用橡皮圈和夹闭辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的有效性:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr;34(4):364-370. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22446.
4
ESD with double clips and rubber band traction of neoplastic lesions developed in the appendiceal orifice is effective and safe.采用双夹子及橡皮圈牵引对阑尾开口处发生的肿瘤性病变进行内镜粘膜下剥离术是有效且安全的。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E388-E395. doi: 10.1055/a-1072-4830. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
Usefulness of the combined orthodontic rubber band and clip method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.正畸橡皮圈与夹子联合固定法在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02606-1.
6
Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection using IT knife nano with clip traction method for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合 IT 刀纳米夹提拉法治疗早期食管鳞癌的安全性和有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):450-455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5703-x. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
7
High proficiency of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection with a "tunnel + clip traction" strategy: a large French multicentric study.“隧道+夹闭牵引”策略提高食管内镜黏膜下剥离术的熟练度:一项大型法国多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2359-2366. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09689-7. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
8
Effectiveness of a novel traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions.新型牵引装置在内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗结直肠病变中的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8021-8029. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09228-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
9
Double-clip traction could be superior to the pocket-creation method with cylindrical cap for colonic ESD: a randomized study in an ex vivo model.双夹牵引可能优于带圆柱帽的口袋创造法用于结肠 ESD:一项离体模型的随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1482-1491. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08171-6. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
A snare combined with endoclips to assist in endoscopic submucosal dissection for intraepithelial neoplasia in the entire colon and rectum.一种结合圈套器和内镜夹的装置,用于辅助对全结肠和直肠上皮内瘤变进行内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;54(1):114-121. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1549270. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia: Meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗残留或复发性结直肠肿瘤的有效性和安全性:Meta分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 1;13:a26060982. doi: 10.1055/a-2606-0982. eCollection 2025.
2
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Rubber Bands and Clips Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与传统内镜黏膜下剥离术相比,使用橡皮筋和夹子的内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09074-z.
3
The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial pharyngeal squamous cell neoplasms: a single-center study in China.
内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗下咽浅表性鳞状细胞肿瘤的安全性和有效性:一项中国单中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3600-3609. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11636-1. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
4
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for the Management of Fibrotic Non-Lifting Colorectal Lesions (NLCLs): Results from a Large Multicenter Retrospective Study.内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗纤维化非抬举性大肠病变(NLCLs):一项大型多中心回顾性研究的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 6;17(7):1242. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071242.
5
Development and validation of a predictive model for submucosal fibrosis in patients with early gastric cancer undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection: experience from a large tertiary center.发展和验证用于接受内镜黏膜下剥离术的早期胃癌患者黏膜下纤维化预测模型:来自一个大型三级中心的经验。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2391536. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2391536. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
6
Outcome and predictive factors for perforation in orthodontic rubber band-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of fibrotic colorectal lesions.正畸橡皮圈辅助内镜黏膜下剥离治疗纤维性结直肠病变穿孔的结果和预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67214-3.
7
Salvage endoscopic resection for perforation site recurrence of colonic polyp.结肠息肉穿孔部位复发的挽救性内镜切除术
VideoGIE. 2024 Mar 21;9(7):341-343. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.03.011. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Technical Advances in Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Lower GI Malignancies.下消化道恶性肿瘤内镜切除技术的技术进展
Visc Med. 2024 Jun;40(3):128-143. doi: 10.1159/000538041. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
9
Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.挽救性内镜治疗内镜切除术后结直肠残留或复发肿瘤的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3027-3034. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10879-8. Epub 2024 May 14.
10
Approaches and considerations in the endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer.内镜治疗 T1 结直肠癌的方法和注意事项。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):563-576. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.487. Epub 2024 May 14.