Shi Shana, Hu Baoqing, Yan Yan, Li Xiaoqing, Zhou Kaichun, Tang Chuanyong, Xie Binggeng
College of Resources and Environment Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf (Nanning Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanning 530001, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030991.
The karst area in northwestern Guangxi is poor, underdeveloped, and ecologically fragile. It is experiencing rocky desertification, which creates challenges that are more severe than those of other regional ecological environments. In this paper, the ecological footprint (EF) model is used to analyze the ecological carrying capacity (EC) in northwestern Guangxi from 1995 to 2015, and the differences in karst counties with different poverty levels are discussed. The results show that (1) since 1995, the EC of northwestern Guangxi has continued to decrease, the EF has continued to increase, the ecological deficit (ED) has been expanding, and the status of the region has been unsustainable for a long time. (2) The evolutionary patterns, EF and EC of karst counties with different poverty levels are different. The county with the lowest poverty rate has the fastest growth rate of the per capita EF. The county with the largest proportion of karst area has the lowest EC. (3) It is recommended that different types of counties take different measures, including strengthening ecological environment protection, carrying out rocky desertification control and ecological resettlement projects, and reducing energy consumption. This study can provide information for the sustainable development of the karst region and provide decision support for regional poverty alleviation.
桂西北岩溶地区贫困、欠发达且生态脆弱。该地区正经历石漠化,所带来的挑战比其他区域生态环境更为严峻。本文运用生态足迹(EF)模型分析了1995年至2015年桂西北的生态承载力(EC),并探讨了不同贫困水平岩溶县的差异。结果表明:(1)自1995年以来,桂西北的生态承载力持续下降,生态足迹持续增加,生态赤字不断扩大,该地区长期处于不可持续状态。(2)不同贫困水平岩溶县的演变模式、生态足迹和生态承载力各不相同。贫困率最低的县人均生态足迹增长速度最快。岩溶面积占比最大的县生态承载力最低。(3)建议不同类型的县采取不同措施,包括加强生态环境保护、开展石漠化治理和生态移民工程以及降低能源消耗。本研究可为岩溶地区的可持续发展提供信息,并为区域扶贫提供决策支持。