• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估年轻成年人的糖代谢异常风险:加拿大糖尿病风险问卷的验证。

Assessing Dysglycemia Risk Among Younger Adults: A Validation of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jul;44(5):379-386.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.11.002
PMID:32033917
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Canadian prevalence and incidence of diabetes has increased by the greatest extent in young adulthood. The original Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire (CANRISK) was created to assess dysglycemia risk among adults ≥40 years of age, but it has not been validated among younger adults. Furthermore, it is unclear whether a young adult-specific risk score would better identify dysglycemia in this age group.

METHODS

Analyses were done on participants who completed the self-administered CANRISK and underwent anthropometric and blood glucose measurements, were 18 to 39 years of age, were not pregnant and had no previous diabetes diagnosis. A risk model was generated from a lenient stepwise function fit with predictors identified through univariate analyses. Risk scores were produced from adjusted odds ratios. Model performance was internally validated using bootstrap methods and compared with the original CANRISK prognostic tool.

RESULTS

Of the 3,334 participants included in the study, 194 (5.8%) and 51 (1.5%) were living with prediabetes or undiagnosed diabetes, respectively. The model displayed an area under the curve of 73.0%, adjusted to 72.9% after bootstrapping; however, using the original CANRISK model resulted in similar results (area under the curve, 71.4%). Sensitivity and specificity of the new and original models were also comparable (78.8% vs 77.1% and 54.0% vs 55.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The original CANRISK score performed well among young adults, even when compared with a young adult-specific model. We suggest that the cut point be lowered for young adults and the tool be permitted for use in this age group.

摘要

目的

在所有年龄段中,加拿大成年人糖尿病的患病率和发病率增长幅度最大。最初的加拿大糖尿病风险问卷(CANRISK)是为评估≥40 岁成年人的血糖异常风险而创建的,但尚未在年轻成年人中进行验证。此外,尚不清楚年轻成年人特异性风险评分是否能更好地识别该年龄段的血糖异常。

方法

对完成自我管理的 CANRISK 问卷调查且接受了人体测量和血糖测量、年龄在 18 至 39 岁之间、未怀孕且无先前糖尿病诊断的参与者进行了分析。使用宽松的逐步函数生成风险模型,通过单变量分析确定预测因子。通过调整后的优势比生成风险评分。使用自举方法对内部分数模型进行验证,并与原始 CANRISK 预测工具进行比较。

结果

在纳入研究的 3334 名参与者中,194 名(5.8%)和 51 名(1.5%)分别患有前期糖尿病或未确诊的糖尿病。该模型的曲线下面积为 73.0%,经过自举后调整为 72.9%;然而,使用原始 CANRISK 模型得到的结果相似(曲线下面积为 71.4%)。新模型和原始模型的敏感性和特异性也相当(分别为 78.8%比 77.1%和 54.0%比 55.0%)。

结论

即使与年轻成年人特异性模型相比,原始 CANRISK 评分在年轻成年人中表现良好。我们建议将年轻成年人的切点降低,并允许在该年龄段使用该工具。

相似文献

1
Assessing Dysglycemia Risk Among Younger Adults: A Validation of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire.评估年轻成年人的糖代谢异常风险:加拿大糖尿病风险问卷的验证。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jul;44(5):379-386.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
Effectiveness of the CANRISK tool in the identification of dysglycemia in First Nations and Métis in Canada.CANRISK 工具在识别加拿大第一民族和梅蒂斯人血糖异常中的有效性。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Feb;38(2):55-63. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.2.02.
3
Assessment of dysglycemia risk in the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut: using the CANRISK tool.努纳武特基蒂克美奥特地区的血糖失调风险评估:使用 CANRISK 工具。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017 Apr;37(4):114-122. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.4.02.
4
Evaluating the utility of self-reported questionnaire data to screen for dysglycemia in young adults: Findings from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.评估自报告问卷数据在筛查年轻成年人糖代谢异常中的效用:来自美国国家健康和营养检查调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Validating the CANRISK prognostic model for assessing diabetes risk in Canada's multi-ethnic population.验证CANRISK预后模型在评估加拿大多民族人群糖尿病风险中的作用。
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011 Dec;32(1):19-31.
6
Effectiveness of the CANRISK tool in the identification of dysglycemia in a Canadian South Asian Population.CANRISK 工具在加拿大南亚人群中识别糖代谢异常的有效性。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(7-8):287-294. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.7/8.03.
7
The Usefulness of the Canadian Diabetes Risk Assessment Questionnaire (CANRISK) in Predicting Dysglycemia in Women with Histories of Gestational Diabetes.加拿大糖尿病风险评估问卷(CANRISK)在预测有妊娠期糖尿病病史女性血糖异常方面的效用
Can J Diabetes. 2015 Dec;39(6):491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
8
Estimating the Rates of Undiagnosed Prediabetes and Diabetes Among People Experiencing Homelessness.估算无家可归者中未被诊断的糖尿病前期和糖尿病的发病率。
Can J Diabetes. 2024 Aug;48(6):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
Dysglycemia risk score in Saudi Arabia: A tool to identify people at high future risk of developing type 2 diabetes.沙特阿拉伯的血糖异常风险评分:一种识别未来发生 2 型糖尿病高风险人群的工具。
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Jul;11(4):844-855. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13213. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
The prevalence of undiagnosed Prediabetes/type 2 diabetes, prehypertension/hypertension and obesity among ethnic groups of adolescents in Western Canada.加拿大西部青少年族群中未确诊的糖尿病前期/2型糖尿病、高血压前期/高血压和肥胖症的患病率。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1924-6.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2024 Nov 3;196(37):E1274-E1275. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.240398-f.
2
Young-onset type 2 diabetes.青年发病型2型糖尿病
CMAJ. 2024 Aug 25;196(28):E977. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.240398.
3
Prevalence and Associations of Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Sociodemographic Factors in Saudi Arabia: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Study.沙特阿拉伯 2 型糖尿病风险及社会人口因素的流行情况及相关性:一项基于网络的横断面调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2269. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032269.