Rukundo Isaac R, Danao Mary-Grace C
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, USA.
J Food Prot. 2020 Jun 1;83(6):968-974. doi: 10.4315/JFP-19-515.
Turmeric sourced from six retailers was processed into a powder and adulterated with metanil yellow (MY) at concentrations of 0.0 to 30% (w/w). A handheld near-infrared spectrometer was used to obtain spectral scans of the samples, which were preprocessed using Savitzky-Golay first-derivative (SG1) approximation using 61 smoothing points and second-order polynomial. The preprocessed spectra were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) followed by classification by soft independent modeling class analogy (SIMCA) and were used to group the adulterated turmeric powder samples according to the source (i.e., processor) of adulteration. Results showed the first principal component (PC1) of PCA models was sensitive to adulteration level, but when coupled with SIMCA, unadulterated and adulterated samples could be classified according to their source despite having high levels of MY. At 5% level of significance, all of the samples were correctly classed for origin during validation. Some samples were classified under two groups, indicating possible inherent similarities. When the PCA model was built using only unadulterated samples, the PCA-SIMCA model could not classify the adulterated samples but could classify those with very low levels (≤2%, w/w) of MY, allowing for segregation of adulterated samples but not identification of sources. The combination of near-infrared and PCA-SIMCA modeling is a great tool not only to detect adulterated turmeric powder but also, potentially, to deter it in the future because the source of adulterated food can be traced back to the source of adulteration.
从六家零售商处采购的姜黄被加工成粉末,并掺入浓度为0.0%至30%(w/w)的间苯二酚黄(MY)。使用手持式近红外光谱仪对样品进行光谱扫描,采用Savitzky-Golay一阶导数(SG1)近似法,使用61个平滑点和二阶多项式对样品进行预处理。对预处理后的光谱进行主成分分析(PCA),然后通过软独立建模类比法(SIMCA)进行分类,并根据掺假来源(即加工者)对掺假姜黄粉样品进行分组。结果表明,PCA模型的第一主成分(PC1)对掺假水平敏感,但与SIMCA结合使用时,尽管含有高含量的MY,未掺假和掺假的样品仍可根据其来源进行分类。在5%的显著性水平下,所有样品在验证过程中均能正确分类其来源。一些样品被分为两组,表明可能存在内在相似性。当仅使用未掺假样品建立PCA模型时,PCA-SIMCA模型无法对掺假样品进行分类,但可以对MY含量非常低(≤2%,w/w)的样品进行分类,从而实现掺假样品的分离,但无法识别其来源。近红外光谱与PCA-SIMCA建模相结合是一种很好的工具,不仅可以检测掺假姜黄粉,而且有可能在未来防止掺假,因为掺假食品的来源可以追溯到掺假源头。