• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用模式识别评估红外光谱法对掺假姜黄粉的鉴别。

An evaluation of IR spectroscopy for authentication of adulterated turmeric powder using pattern recognition.

机构信息

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Food Chem. 2021 Dec 1;364:130406. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130406. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130406
PMID:34174644
Abstract

Turmeric powder is a widely consumed spice, making it an attractive target for adulteration, which is not easily detected. The study examined the simultaneous use of IR spectroscopy in combination with controlled (PCA) and uncontrolled (PLS-DA and CMCA) pattern recognition techniques to detect and classify Sudan Red, starch and metanil yellow fraud in turmeric powder nondestructively. The results showed that the two major peaks in turmeric powder at 1625 cm and 1600 cm are not present in Sudan Red, starch and metanil yellow because these materials lack this functional group. Data distribution at the two PC locations showed clearly scattered clusters according to the four mixing studied models (turmeric powder, turmeric powder-Sudan Red mixture, turmeric powder-starch mixture and turmeric powder-metanil yellow mixture), but there was a clear overlap between turmeric powder and turmeric powder - Sudan red mixture. Both PLS-DA and SIMCA supervised methods showed satisfactory discrimination. The results also showed that in all the sample groups, when the samples were classified by PLS-DA, the values were higher compared to the SIMCA model. The overall precision of the SIMCA and PLS-DA classifier were 82% and 92%, respectively. However, when considering only two main categories adulterated (the samples at the groups 2, 3 and 4) and pure (the samples at the group 1), an acceptable degree of separation between the resulting classes was obtained. Consequently, IR spectroscopy with pattern recognition methods was found to be a promising tool for nondestructive grouping of turmeric powder samples with different types of adulteration in turmeric powder.

摘要

姜黄粉是一种广泛食用的香料,因此很容易成为掺假的目标,而这些掺假物不易被察觉。本研究考察了同时使用红外光谱结合控制(PCA)和非控制(PLS-DA 和 CMCA)模式识别技术,对姜黄粉中非破坏性地检测和分类苏丹红、淀粉和间苯二胺黄欺诈。结果表明,姜黄粉中在 1625cm 和 1600cm 处的两个主要峰不存在于苏丹红、淀粉和间苯二胺黄中,因为这些材料缺乏这个官能团。根据四个混合研究模型(姜黄粉、姜黄粉-苏丹红混合物、姜黄粉-淀粉混合物和姜黄粉-间苯二胺黄混合物),数据在两个 PC 位置的分布显示出明显的分散聚类,但姜黄粉和姜黄粉-苏丹红混合物之间存在明显的重叠。PLS-DA 和 SIMCA 监督方法都显示出令人满意的区分。结果还表明,在所有样品组中,当用 PLS-DA 对样品进行分类时,其值比 SIMCA 模型高。SIMCA 和 PLS-DA 分类器的总体精度分别为 82%和 92%。然而,当仅考虑两种主要掺假类型(样品在第 2、3 和 4 组)和纯品(样品在第 1 组)时,获得了可接受的分类间分离度。因此,红外光谱结合模式识别方法被发现是一种有前途的工具,用于对不同类型掺假的姜黄粉样品进行非破坏性分组。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of IR spectroscopy for authentication of adulterated turmeric powder using pattern recognition.利用模式识别评估红外光谱法对掺假姜黄粉的鉴别。
Food Chem. 2021 Dec 1;364:130406. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130406. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
2
Identifying Turmeric Powder by Source and Metanil Yellow Adulteration Levels Using Near-Infrared Spectra and PCA-SIMCA Modeling.利用近红外光谱和PCA-SIMCA模型按来源及甲基黄掺假水平鉴别姜黄粉
J Food Prot. 2020 Jun 1;83(6):968-974. doi: 10.4315/JFP-19-515.
3
Evaluation of Turmeric Powder Adulterated with Metanil Yellow Using FT-Raman and FT-IR Spectroscopy.使用傅里叶变换拉曼光谱和傅里叶变换红外光谱法评估掺有酸性金黄的姜黄粉。
Foods. 2016 May 17;5(2):36. doi: 10.3390/foods5020036.
4
Raman and IR spectroscopic modality for authentication of turmeric powder.拉曼和红外光谱法鉴定姜黄粉。
Food Chem. 2020 Aug 1;320:126567. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126567. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Detection of Additives and Chemical Contaminants in Turmeric Powder Using FT-IR Spectroscopy.利用傅里叶变换红外光谱法检测姜黄粉中的添加剂和化学污染物
Foods. 2019 Apr 26;8(5):143. doi: 10.3390/foods8050143.
6
A simple 2-directional high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of curcumin, metanil yellow, and sudan dyes in turmeric, chili, and curry powders.一种用于同时测定姜黄、辣椒和咖喱粉中姜黄素、间苯二酚黄和苏丹染料的简单双向高效薄层色谱法。
J AOAC Int. 2008 Nov-Dec;91(6):1387-96.
7
FT-NIR spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis for detection of starch adulteration in turmeric powder.傅里叶变换近红外光谱结合多变量分析用于检测姜黄粉中的淀粉掺假。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2019 Jun;36(6):863-875. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2019.1600746. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
Non-destructive Raman spectroscopy as a tool for measuring ASTA color values and Sudan I content in paprika powder.非破坏性拉曼光谱法作为一种测量辣椒粉 ASTA 颜色值和苏丹 I 含量的工具。
Food Chem. 2019 Feb 15;274:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.129. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
Assessing saffron (Crocus sativus L.) adulteration with plant-derived adulterants by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics.采用漫反射红外傅里叶变换光谱结合化学计量学评估西红花(藏红花)与植物源性掺杂物的掺假。
Talanta. 2017 Jan 1;162:558-566. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.10.072. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Spectral separation degree method for Vis-NIR spectroscopic discriminant analysis of milk powder adulteration.光谱分离度法用于 Vis-NIR 光谱判别分析奶粉掺假。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2023 Nov 15;301:122975. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122975. Epub 2023 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Spice and Herb Frauds: Types, Incidence, and Detection: The State of the Art.香料和草药欺诈:类型、发生率及检测:最新进展
Foods. 2023 Sep 8;12(18):3373. doi: 10.3390/foods12183373.
2
Rapid detection of adulteration in powder of ginger ( Roscoe) by FT-NIR spectroscopy combined with chemometrics.傅里叶变换近红外光谱结合化学计量学快速检测姜粉(Roscoe)中的掺假情况。
Food Chem X. 2022 Sep 17;15:100450. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100450. eCollection 2022 Oct 30.
3
Comparative Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Halogenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Different Parts of (L.) Britt.
不同部位(L.) Britt. 中的多环芳烃和卤代多环芳烃的比较分析
Molecules. 2022 May 13;27(10):3133. doi: 10.3390/molecules27103133.