Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):2829-2840. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15032. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Invasive vertebrates are frequently reported to have catastrophic effects on the populations of species which they directly impact. It follows then, that if invaders exert strong suppressive effects on some species then other species will indirectly benefit due to ecological release from interactions with directly impacted species. However, evidence that invasive vertebrates trigger such trophic cascades and alter community structure in terrestrial ecosystems remains rare. Here, we ask how the cane toad, a vertebrate invader that is toxic to many of Australia's vertebrate predators, influences lizard assemblages in a semi-arid rangeland. In our study area, the density of cane toads is influenced by the availability of water accessible to toads. We compared an index of the abundance of sand goannas, a large predatory lizard that is susceptible to poisoning by cane toads and the abundances of four lizard families preyed upon by goannas (skinks, pygopods, agamid lizards and geckos) in areas where cane toads were common or rare. Consistent with the idea that suppression of sand goannas by cane toads initiates a trophic cascade, goanna activity was lower and small lizards were more abundant where toads were common. The hypothesis that suppression of sand goannas by cane toads triggers a trophic cascade was further supported by our findings that small terrestrial lizards that are frequently preyed upon by goannas were more affected by toad abundance than arboreal geckos, which are rarely consumed by goannas. Furthermore, the abundance of at least one genus of terrestrial skinks benefitted from allogenic ecosystem engineering by goannas where toads were rare. Overall, our study provides evidence that the invasion of ecosystems by non-native species can have important effects on the structure and integrity of native communities extending beyond their often most obvious and frequently documented direct ecological effects.
入侵的脊椎动物经常对其直接影响的物种的种群产生灾难性的影响。因此,如果入侵物种对某些物种产生强烈的抑制作用,那么由于与直接受影响物种的相互作用而产生的生态释放,其他物种将间接受益。然而,入侵的脊椎动物引发这种营养级联并改变陆地生态系统群落结构的证据仍然很少。在这里,我们询问了一种对澳大利亚许多脊椎动物捕食者有毒的脊椎动物入侵物种——甘蔗蟾蜍,如何影响半干旱牧场的蜥蜴群落。在我们的研究区域,甘蔗蟾蜍的密度受蟾蜍可获得的水的影响。我们比较了在蟾蜍常见或罕见的地区,沙巨蜥(一种易受甘蔗蟾蜍毒害的大型捕食蜥蜴)的丰度指数,以及被巨蜥捕食的四个蜥蜴科(石龙子、蚓蜥、鬣蜥和壁虎)的丰度。与甘蔗蟾蜍对沙巨蜥的抑制引发营养级联的观点一致,蟾蜍常见的地方,巨蜥的活动较少,小型蜥蜴更为丰富。甘蔗蟾蜍对沙巨蜥的抑制引发营养级联的假设得到了进一步支持,我们发现,经常被巨蜥捕食的小型陆生蜥蜴受蟾蜍丰度的影响大于很少被巨蜥捕食的树栖壁虎。此外,在蟾蜍稀少的地方,至少有一个陆生石龙子属的物种受益于巨蜥的异体生态工程。总的来说,我们的研究提供了证据,表明非本地物种入侵生态系统可能对原生群落的结构和完整性产生重要影响,这种影响超出了它们通常最明显和经常记录的直接生态影响。