Suppr超能文献

双筒腓骨瓣与带血管蒂髂嵴瓣在下颌骨重建中的应用比较

Double-Barrel Fibula Flap Versus Vascularized Iliac Crest Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction.

作者信息

Yu Yao, Zhang Wen-Bo, Liu Xiao-Jing, Guo Chuan-Bin, Yu Guang-Yan, Peng Xin

机构信息

Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

Attending Doctor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 May;78(5):844-850. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The double-barrel fibula flap and vascularized iliac crest flap are both commonly used for mandibular reconstruction. The present study compared the usage and reconstruction outcomes of transplanted bone with these 2 methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data from 30 patients who had undergone mandibular osteotomy and reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 30 patients, 20 received a vascularized iliac crest flap (group A) and 10 received a double-barrel fibula flap (group B). The following variables were compared between the 2 groups: volume of bone flap (VBF), volume of effective bone flap (VEBF; ie, overlap between the volume of the ideal mandible [VIM] and the VBF), usage of the bone flap (VEBF divided by the VBF), mandibular reconstruction rate (VEBF divided by the VIM), volume of needless bone flap (VNBF; ie, VBF minus VEBF; the VNBF included the volume of needless buccal bone flap [VNBBF] and the volume of needless lingual bone flap [VNLBF]), percentage of alveolar crest restoration (PACR; ie, effective bone flap width divided by ideal alveolar crest width), and height of the bone flap (HBF). The independent-samples t test and the χ test were used to compare the variables between the 2 groups. Statistical significance was at P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

Usage of the bone flap and the length of the mandibular defect were significantly greater in group B than in group A (P = .039 and P < .001, respectively). The VBF, VNBF, and VNLBF were significantly greater in group A than in group B (P < .001 for both). The mandibular reconstruction rate, VNBBF, PACR, HBF, and tooth implantation rate were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The double-barrel fibula flap can effectively restore the height of the alveolar crest, reconstruct longer mandibular defects, and provide a better buccal and lingual appearance compared with the vascularized iliac crest flap. Although the vascularized iliac crest flap can provide sufficient bone quantity, it must be contoured to the mandible.

摘要

目的

双筒腓骨瓣和带血管蒂髂嵴瓣均常用于下颌骨重建。本研究比较了这两种方法移植骨的使用情况和重建效果。

患者与方法

回顾性分析30例行下颌骨截骨术及重建术患者的数据。30例患者中,20例接受带血管蒂髂嵴瓣移植(A组),10例接受双筒腓骨瓣移植(B组)。比较两组之间的以下变量:骨瓣体积(VBF)、有效骨瓣体积(VEBF;即理想下颌骨体积[VIM]与VBF的重叠部分)、骨瓣利用率(VEBF除以VBF)、下颌骨重建率(VEBF除以VIM)、多余骨瓣体积(VNBF;即VBF减去VEBF;VNBF包括多余颊侧骨瓣体积[VNBBF]和多余舌侧骨瓣体积[VNLBF])、牙槽嵴修复百分比(PACR;即有效骨瓣宽度除以理想牙槽嵴宽度)以及骨瓣高度(HBF)。采用独立样本t检验和χ检验比较两组间的变量。统计学显著性水平为P≤0.05。

结果

B组的骨瓣利用率和下颌骨缺损长度显著大于A组(分别为P = 0.039和P < 0.001)。A组的VBF、VNBF和VNLBF显著大于B组(两者均为P < 0.001)。两组之间的下颌骨重建率、VNBBF、PACR、HBF和牙齿植入率相当。

结论

与带血管蒂髂嵴瓣相比,双筒腓骨瓣能有效恢复牙槽嵴高度,重建更长的下颌骨缺损,并提供更好的颊舌侧外观。虽然带血管蒂髂嵴瓣能提供足够的骨量,但必须对其进行塑形以适应下颌骨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验