Maudgal P C, Stout R W, van Balen A T
Free University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Aug;69(4):399-405. doi: 10.1007/BF00162752.
Contrast sensitivity curves of 211 randomly selected patients were drawn using the VCTS chart. Depending on the type of curve obtained, patients were grouped in different diagnostic categories following the instructions supplied with the chart. Clinical examination revealed that the VCTS chart curves indicated a false diagnosis of cataract in 65.5% patients and in 54.2% patients a false diagnosis of glaucoma. In a number of additional patients, VCTS chart testing had failed to indicate the presence of cataract or glaucoma. Contrary to the claims of the manufacturer our results demonstrate that the VCTS chart has no value as a screening device in a clinical practice.
使用视觉对比敏感度测试(VCTS)图表绘制了211名随机选择患者的对比敏感度曲线。根据所得曲线类型,按照图表附带说明将患者分为不同诊断类别。临床检查显示,VCTS图表曲线在65.5%的患者中显示出白内障的误诊,在54.2%的患者中显示出青光眼的误诊。在一些其他患者中,VCTS图表测试未能显示白内障或青光眼的存在。与制造商的说法相反,我们的结果表明,VCTS图表在临床实践中作为筛查工具没有价值。