Westing S H, Seger J Y, Karlson E, Ekblom B
Department of Physiology III, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;58(1-2):100-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00636611.
The primary purpose of this investigation was to study the eccentric and concentric torque-velocity characteristics of the quadriceps femoris in man using a recently developed combined isometric, concentric and eccentric controlled velocity dynamometer (the SPARK System). A secondary purpose was to compare the method error associated with maximal voluntary concentric and eccentric torque output over a range of testing velocities. 21 males (21-32 years) performed on two separate days maximal voluntary isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions of the quadriceps femoris at 4 isokinetic lever arm velocities of 0 degree.s-1 (isometric), 30 degrees.s-1, 120 degrees.s-1 and 270 degrees.s-1. Eccentric peak torque and angle-specific torques (measured every 10 degrees from 30 degrees to 70 degrees) did not significantly change from 0 degrees.s-1 to 270 degrees.s-1 (p greater than 0.005) with the exception of angle-specific 40 degrees torque, which significantly increased; p less than 0.05). The mean method error was significantly higher for the eccentric tests (10.6% +/- 1.6%) than for the concentric tests (8.1% +/- 1.7%) (p less than 0.05). The mean method error decreased slightly with increasing concentric velocity (p greater than 0.05), and increased slightly with increasing eccentric velocity (p greater than 0.05). A tension restricting neural mechanism, if active during maximal eccentric contractions, could possibly account for the large difference seen between the present eccentric torque-velocity results and the classic results obtained from isolated animal muscle.
本研究的主要目的是使用最近开发的等长、向心和离心控制速度联合测力计(SPARK系统),研究人类股四头肌的离心和向心扭矩-速度特性。次要目的是比较在一系列测试速度下与最大自主向心和离心扭矩输出相关的方法误差。21名男性(21 - 32岁)在两个不同的日子里,以0度·秒⁻¹(等长)、30度·秒⁻¹、120度·秒⁻¹和270度·秒⁻¹这4个等速杠杆臂速度进行股四头肌的最大自主等长、向心和离心收缩。从0度·秒⁻¹到270度·秒⁻¹,除了特定角度40度扭矩显著增加(p < 0.05)外,离心峰值扭矩和特定角度扭矩(从30度到70度每10度测量一次)没有显著变化(p > 0.005)。离心测试的平均方法误差(10.6% ± 1.6%)显著高于向心测试(8.1% ± 1.7%)(p < 0.05)。平均方法误差随着向心速度增加略有下降(p > 0.05),随着离心速度增加略有上升(p > 0.05)。一种张力限制神经机制,如果在最大离心收缩期间活跃,可能解释了目前离心扭矩-速度结果与从分离的动物肌肉获得的经典结果之间的巨大差异。