Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Behav Sleep Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):192-207. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2020.1725012. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
: To assess whether worry and rumination differ in predicting nighttime sleep disturbance versus daytime sleep-related impairment, as assessed using short forms from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). : Adults recruited from the United States population ( = 459) via an online crowdsourcing service. : Factor analysis explored whether items comprising validated measures of worry and rumination loaded onto separate factors. Hierarchical multiple regression models entered worry and rumination in a stepwise fashion to assess their relative strength in predicting PROMIS sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment, after controlling for 17 covariates. All analyses were run twice using sleep-specific and general measures of worry and rumination. : Worry and rumination items loaded onto separate factors. In the regression analysis of sleep-specific cognition, only worry entered the model predicting sleep disturbance, whereas rumination entered after worry in the model predicting sleep-related impairment. In the analysis of general cognition, both cognitive process variables significantly predicted the PROMIS outcomes. Worry was the stronger predictor of sleep disturbance, whereas rumination was the stronger predictor of sleep-related impairment. : Worry and rumination were observed to be distinct constructs that separately contributed to predicting daytime sleep-related impairment. Future studies should more closely examine how cognitive processes relate to insomnia symptomology during the day.
为了评估担忧和反刍是否在预测夜间睡眠障碍和日间与睡眠相关的损害方面存在差异,方法是使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)的简短形式进行评估。
:通过在线众包服务从美国人群中招募的成年人(n=459)。
:因子分析探讨了构成已验证的担忧和反刍测量的项目是否分别加载到单独的因子上。在控制了 17 个协变量后,采用分层逐步回归模型分别逐步输入担忧和反刍,以评估它们在预测 PROMIS 睡眠障碍和与睡眠相关的损害方面的相对强度。所有分析均使用针对睡眠的担忧和反刍的特定和一般措施进行了两次。
:担忧和反刍项目分别加载到单独的因子上。在睡眠特异性认知的回归分析中,只有担忧进入了预测睡眠障碍的模型,而反刍则在预测与睡眠相关的损害的模型中进入了担忧之后。在一般认知的分析中,两个认知过程变量都显著预测了 PROMIS 的结果。担忧是睡眠障碍的更强预测因素,而反刍是与睡眠相关的损害的更强预测因素。
:观察到担忧和反刍是不同的结构,它们分别有助于预测日间与睡眠相关的损害。未来的研究应该更仔细地研究认知过程如何与日间的失眠症状相关。