• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门肠管造口术与阑尾造口术在儿童粪便失禁管理中经肛灌肠的比较:系统评价。

Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8L1; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8M5.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8L1.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1196-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.011
PMID:32037219
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have directly compared between cecostomy and appendicostomy for the management of fecal incontinence in pediatric population. This systematic review of the literature describes outcomes and complications following both procedures. We also reviewed studies reporting impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar were searched for chronic constipation pediatric patients who underwent cecostomy or appendicostomy. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality.

RESULTS

An initial literature search retrieved 633 citations. After review of all abstracts, 40 studies were included in the final analysis, assessing a total of 2086 patients. The overall rate of complications was lower in the cecostomy group compared to the appendicostomy group (16.6% and 42.3%, respectively). Achievement of fecal continence and improvement in patient quality of life were found to be similar in both groups, however the need for revision of surgery was approximately 15% higher in the appendicostomy group.

CONCLUSION

Cecostomy has less post procedural complications, however rates of patient satisfaction and impact on quality of life were similar following both procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

很少有研究直接比较经乙状结肠造口术和阑尾造口术在小儿粪便失禁管理中的作用。本系统综述描述了这两种手术的结果和并发症。我们还回顾了报告对生活质量和患者满意度影响的研究。

方法

在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)和 Google Scholar 上搜索接受乙状结肠造口术或阑尾造口术的慢性便秘小儿患者的研究。两名评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估质量。

结果

初步文献检索检索到 633 条引文。在审查了所有摘要后,共有 40 项研究纳入最终分析,共评估了 2086 例患者。乙状结肠造口组的并发症总体发生率低于阑尾造口组(分别为 16.6%和 42.3%)。两组患者的粪便控便能力和生活质量改善情况相似,但阑尾造口组需要再次手术的比例约高 15%。

结论

乙状结肠造口术后并发症较少,但两种手术的患者满意度和对生活质量的影响相似。

证据水平

III 级。

相似文献

1
Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: A systematic review.经肛门肠管造口术与阑尾造口术在儿童粪便失禁管理中经肛灌肠的比较:系统评价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1196-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
A comparison of Malone appendicostomy and cecostomy for antegrade access as adjuncts to a bowel management program for patients with functional constipation or fecal incontinence.比较马龙阑尾造口术和盲肠造口术作为功能性便秘或大便失禁患者肠道管理计划辅助手段的顺行通路。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
3
Malone appendicostomy versus cecostomy tube insertion for children with intractable constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.马龙式阑尾造口术与盲肠造瘘管置入术治疗儿童顽固性便秘:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):885-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
In-hospital resource utilization, outcome analysis and radiation exposure in children undergoing appendicostomy vs cecostomy tube placement.接受阑尾造口术与盲肠造瘘管置入术的儿童的院内资源利用、结局分析及辐射暴露情况
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):648.e1-648.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Laparoscopic Appendicostomy Low-Profile Balloon Button for Antegrade Enemas in Children.用于儿童顺行灌肠的腹腔镜阑尾造口术低轮廓球囊按钮
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):354-358. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0282. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Outcomes following fecal continence procedures in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction.神经源性肠功能障碍患者的粪便控制手术后的结果。
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.052. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
7
Significance of retrograde flow with antegrade continence enemas in children with fecal incontinence and constipation.经肛门顺行灌肠在伴有大便失禁和便秘的儿童中的逆行血流的意义。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Sep;79(3):519-524. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12297. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
Appendiceal versus ileal segment for antegrade continence enema.用于顺行性可控灌肠的阑尾段与回肠段对比
J Urol. 2002 Feb;167(2 Pt 1):683-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69125-0.
9
The role of a colon resection in combination with a Malone appendicostomy as part of a bowel management program for the treatment of fecal incontinence.结直肠切除术联合麦氏阑尾成形术作为肠道管理方案的一部分治疗大便失禁。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Nov;48(11):2296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.058.
10
Primary placement of a skin-level Cecostomy Tube for Antegrade Colonic Enema Administration Using a Modification of the Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC).使用改良的腹腔镜辅助经皮内镜下盲肠造口术(LAPEC)进行皮肤水平盲肠造口管的初次放置,用于顺行结肠灌肠给药。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Mar;54(3):486-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after appendicostomy and neo-appendicostomy in a single institution.单一机构中阑尾造口术和新阑尾造口术的术后结果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 24;41(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06099-3.
2
Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) and constipation in children: a multifaceted approach (literature review).儿童脊髓栓系综合征(TCS)与便秘:多方面探讨(文献综述)
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 27;87(3):1529-1542. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003044. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience.经皮乙状结肠造口术:25 年两机构经验。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Jun;54(7):1137-1143. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05936-2. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Malone appendicostomy: a 6-year perspective.机器人辅助腹腔镜 Malone 阑尾吻合术:6 年的观察。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Feb 24;40(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05641-z.
5
Comparing binary & ordinal definitions of urinary & stool continence outcomes: Data from the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.比较尿便控遗结局的二分类和有序分类定义:来自国家脊柱裂患者注册数据库的数据。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Oct;20(5):810-820. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
2023 Canadian Urological Association/Pediatric Urologists of Canada guideline: Pediatric patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction Full-text version.2023年加拿大泌尿外科学会/加拿大儿科泌尿外科医生指南:神经源性下尿路功能障碍的儿科患者 全文版
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Oct;17(10):E338-E357. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8390.
7
State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Spinal Anomalies.小儿结直肠问题的最新肠道管理:脊柱异常
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;10(9):1558. doi: 10.3390/children10091558.
8
Pediatric Bowel Management Options and Organizational Aspects.儿科肠道管理方案与组织层面
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;10(4):633. doi: 10.3390/children10040633.
9
Therapeutic utility of percutaneous cecostomy in adults: an updated systematic review.经皮盲肠造口术在成人中的治疗效用:一项更新的系统评价
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Feb 4;15:26317745211073411. doi: 10.1177/26317745211073411. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.