• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮乙状结肠造口术:25 年两机构经验。

Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 105, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, 72202, AR, USA.

Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Jun;54(7):1137-1143. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05936-2. Epub 2024 May 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-05936-2
PMID:38693250
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports of technical success, adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy in children are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize technical success, 30-day severe adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy at two centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of hospital course and long-term follow-up (through May 2022) of percutaneous cecostomy tubes placed May 1997 to August 2011 at two children's hospitals was used. Outcomes assessed included technical success (defined as successful tube placement into the colon allowing antegrade colonic enemas), length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, surgery consults, surgical repair, VP shunt infection, ongoing flushes, tube removal, duration between maintenance tube exchanges, and deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 215 procedures were performed in 208 patients (90 institution A, 125 institution B). Tubes were placed for neurogenic bowel (72.1%, n = 155) and functional constipation (27.9%, n = 60). Technical success was 98.1% (211/215) and did not differ between centers (p = 0.74). Surgical repair was required for bowel leakage in 5.1% (11/215) and VP shunt infection was managed in 2.1% (2/95). Compared to functional constipation, patients with neurogenic bowel had higher % tube remaining (65.3% [96/147] versus 25.9% [15/58], p < 0.001) and higher ongoing flushes at follow-up (42.2% [62/147] versus 12.1% [7/58], p < 0.001). Tube removal for dissatisfaction occurred in 15.6% [32/205] and did not differ between groups (p = 0.98). Eight deaths due to co-morbidity occurred after a median of 7.4 years (IQR 9.3) of tube access.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous cecostomy is technically successful in the vast majority of patients and provided durable access in most. Bowel leakage and VP shunt infection are uncommon, severe adverse events.

摘要

背景

经皮乙状结肠造口术在儿童中的技术成功率、不良事件和长期结果的报告有限。

目的

描述两家中心的经皮乙状结肠造口术的技术成功率、30 天内严重不良事件和长期结果。

材料和方法

对 1997 年 5 月至 2011 年 8 月期间在两家儿童医院进行的经皮乙状结肠造口管放置的住院过程和长期随访(截至 2022 年 5 月)进行回顾性分析。评估的结果包括技术成功率(定义为成功将造口管插入结肠,允许逆行结肠灌洗)、住院时间、30 天内严重不良事件、手术咨询、手术修复、脑室-腹腔分流感染、持续冲洗、造口管移除、维持性造口管更换之间的时间、以及死亡。

结果

共对 208 例患者(90 例来自机构 A,125 例来自机构 B)进行了 215 次操作。造口管的放置指征为神经源性肠道(72.1%,n=155)和功能性便秘(27.9%,n=60)。技术成功率为 98.1%(211/215),两个中心之间无差异(p=0.74)。5.1%(11/215)的患者发生肠漏,需要手术修复,2.1%(2/95)的脑室-腹腔分流感染需要治疗。与功能性便秘相比,神经源性肠道的患者剩余造口管的比例更高(65.3%[96/147]与 25.9%[15/58],p<0.001),随访时持续冲洗的比例更高(42.2%[62/147]与 12.1%[7/58],p<0.001)。因不满意而拔除造口管的发生率为 15.6%(32/205),两组之间无差异(p=0.98)。8 例死亡是由于合并症,发生在造口管使用后中位数为 7.4 年(IQR 9.3)。

结论

经皮乙状结肠造口术在绝大多数患者中技术上是成功的,并为大多数患者提供了持久的通道。肠漏和脑室-腹腔分流感染是罕见的严重不良事件。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience.经皮乙状结肠造口术:25 年两机构经验。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Jun;54(7):1137-1143. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05936-2. Epub 2024 May 2.
2
Primary placement of a skin-level Cecostomy Tube for Antegrade Colonic Enema Administration Using a Modification of the Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC).使用改良的腹腔镜辅助经皮内镜下盲肠造口术(LAPEC)进行皮肤水平盲肠造口管的初次放置,用于顺行结肠灌肠给药。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Mar;54(3):486-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
3
A comparison of Malone appendicostomy and cecostomy for antegrade access as adjuncts to a bowel management program for patients with functional constipation or fecal incontinence.比较马龙阑尾造口术和盲肠造口术作为功能性便秘或大便失禁患者肠道管理计划辅助手段的顺行通路。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
4
Outcomes and satisfaction in pediatric patients with Chait cecostomy tubes.患有蔡氏盲肠造口管的儿科患者的治疗结果与满意度
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Aug;13(4):365-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 8.
5
The percutaneous cecostomy tube in the management of fecal incontinence in children.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
6
Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous cecostomy for antegrade continence enema.腹腔镜辅助经皮盲肠造口术用于顺行性可控灌肠。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Apr;24(4):261-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0292. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
7
Impact of cecostomy and antegrade colonic enemas on management of fecal incontinence and constipation: ten years of experience in pediatric population.盲肠造口术和顺行结肠灌肠对大便失禁和便秘管理的影响:儿科人群十年经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;43(8):1445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.051.
8
Cecostomy button for antegrade enemas: survey of 29 patients.用于顺行灌肠的盲肠造口纽扣:29例患者的调查
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Oct;43(10):1853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.03.043.
9
Fecal incontinence in children: treatment with percutaneous cecostomy tube placement--a prospective study.儿童大便失禁:经皮盲肠造瘘管置入治疗——一项前瞻性研究
Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):621-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169678.
10
Long-Term outcomes of cecostomy tube insertion for patients with bowel dysfunction: A retrospective review.乙状结肠造口管置入治疗肠功能障碍患者的长期疗效:一项回顾性研究。

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after appendicostomy and neo-appendicostomy in a single institution.单一机构中阑尾造口术和新阑尾造口术的术后结果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 24;41(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06099-3.
2
Percutaneous Cecostomy Catheters.经皮盲肠造口导管
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jan 8;42(1):66-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1801331. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of a health care transition clinic on spina bifida condition management and transition planning.医疗保健过渡诊所对脊柱裂病情管理和过渡计划的影响。
Disabil Health J. 2023 Oct;16(4):101508. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101508. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
2
Adverse Event Classification: Clarification and Validation of the Society of Interventional Radiology Specialty-Specific System.不良事件分类:介入放射学会特定专业系统的澄清与验证
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Jan;34(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Percutaneous Left Colostomy for Fecal Incontinence.
经皮左结肠造口术治疗大便失禁
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Aug;33(8):1012-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: A systematic review.经肛门肠管造口术与阑尾造口术在儿童粪便失禁管理中经肛灌肠的比较:系统评价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1196-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
5
Laparoscopic Appendicostomy Low-Profile Balloon Button for Antegrade Enemas in Children.用于儿童顺行灌肠的腹腔镜阑尾造口术低轮廓球囊按钮
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):354-358. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0282. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee.介入放射学会实践标准委员会提出的新不良事件分类法
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1432-1437.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Outcomes and satisfaction in pediatric patients with Chait cecostomy tubes.患有蔡氏盲肠造口管的儿科患者的治疗结果与满意度
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Aug;13(4):365-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
The transition process of spina bifida patients to adult-centred care: An assessment of the Canadian urology landscape.脊柱裂患者向以成人为主的护理过渡过程:对加拿大泌尿外科现状的评估。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Jan-Feb;11(1-2Suppl1):S88-S91. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4338.
9
Laparoscopic Cecostomy Tube Placement.腹腔镜下盲肠造瘘管置入术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Dec;25(6):e180-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000217.
10
Percutaneous Cecostomy in Adult Patients: Safety and Quality-of-Life Results.成年患者经皮盲肠造口术:安全性及生活质量结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Oct;26(10):1526-1532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jul 21.