Department of Chemistry, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, 23173, USA.
Department of Chemistry, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Jun 26;59(27):10702-10721. doi: 10.1002/anie.201916566. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Between 1910 and 1947, Robert Robinson (primarily), among others, published numerous proposed structures for strychnine. Robinson published 17 of his strychnine papers with his doctoral advisor William Henry Perkin, Jr., though all but two appeared after Robinson had taken his first permanent academic position. This Essay analyzes 20 key publications leading up to Robinson's (correct, then incorrect, then correct again though not definitively) proposal and Woodward's assignment of the actual structure of strychnine. We subjected the assignment of the strychnine structure to a modern computational quantum chemistry workflow. By computing, with density functional theory, H and C NMR chemical shifts for the literature-proposed strychnine structures, we were able to rule out most incorrect structures. C NMR predictions were better at this, but H NMR chemical shifts were helpful. A comparison is made between the consequences of publishing erroneous ideas in the first half of the 20th century and doing so in the 21st century.
从 1910 年到 1947 年,罗伯特·罗宾逊(主要是)和其他人一起发表了许多士的宁的结构提议。罗宾逊与他的博士导师威廉·亨利·珀金(小)一起发表了 17 篇士的宁论文,尽管除了两篇之外,所有论文都是罗宾逊获得第一个终身学术职位之后发表的。本文分析了罗宾逊(正确、错误、然后正确但不确定)提议和伍德沃德分配士的宁实际结构之前的 20 篇关键出版物。我们对士的宁结构的分配进行了现代计算量子化学工作流程。通过密度泛函理论计算文献中提出的士的宁结构的 H 和 C NMR 化学位移,我们能够排除大多数错误的结构。 C NMR 预测在这方面更准确,但 H NMR 化学位移也有帮助。本文比较了 20 世纪上半叶和 21 世纪发表错误观点的后果。