Conrado de Freitas Marcelo, Panissa Valéria L, Cholewa Jason M, Franchini Emerson, Gobbo Luís A, Rossi Fabricio E
Skeletal Muscle Assessment Laboratory (LABSIM), Department of Physical Education, School of Technology and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil -
Department of Nutrition, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, Brazil -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Mar;60(3):374-379. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10227-5. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
The purpose of this study was to investigate if a post-activation potentiation (PAP) protocol may attenuate the acute interference induced by high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) and on subsequent strength exercise performance in recreationally trained men.
Eleven resistance-trained men (age: 25.7±3.7 y) randomly completed three experimental trials: strength exercise (SE) only (4 sets of maximal number of repetitions at 70% on the 45º leg press); concurrent exercise (CE) comprised 5000-m of HIIE at maximal aerobic speed (1:1 effort and pause ratio) followed by SE protocol; CE with post-activation potentiation (CE-PAP), comprised the same CE protocol preceded by one set of 2 repetitions at 90% of 1RM on the 45° leg-press before strength exercise. The number of repetitions performed was recorded for each set and total weight lifted was calculated.
The CE condition induced a greater decrement in volume for the leg press compared to SE and CE-PAP in sets 1 (24±21%; 18±25%), 2 (20±21%; 22±22%), and 3 (19±20%; 25±15%), respectively. Total weight lifted was greater after SE (8,795±2,581 kg) and CE-PAP (8.809±2.655 kg) conditions compared to CE (7.049±2.822 kg) (SE vs. CE: P=0.020) and (CE-PAP vs. CE: P=0.010) but there was no significant difference between SE and CE-PAP (P=1.00).
PAP using a heavy load attenuated acute interference (total volume during lower-body strength) generated by HIIE protocol, but did not enhance volume compared to SE alone.
本研究的目的是调查后激活增强(PAP)方案是否可以减轻高强度间歇运动(HIIE)引起的急性干扰以及对休闲训练男性随后的力量训练表现的影响。
11名进行过抗阻训练的男性(年龄:25.7±3.7岁)随机完成三项实验性试验:仅进行力量训练(SE)(在45°腿举机上以70%的重量进行4组最大重复次数训练);同时进行运动(CE),包括以最大有氧速度进行5000米的HIIE(运动与休息比例为1:1),随后进行SE方案;采用后激活增强的同时进行运动(CE-PAP),包括在力量训练前,先在45°腿举机上以1RM的90%进行一组2次重复训练,然后进行相同的CE方案。记录每组完成的重复次数,并计算举起的总重量。
与SE和CE-PAP相比,CE组在第1组(24±21%;18±25%)、第2组(20±21%;22±22%)和第3组(19±20%;25±15%)的腿举训练量下降幅度更大。与CE组(7.049±2.822千克)相比,SE组(8,795±2,581千克)和CE-PAP组(8,809±2,655千克)举起的总重量更大(SE组与CE组比较:P = 0.020)以及(CE-PAP组与CE组比较:P = 0.010),但SE组和CE-PAP组之间无显著差异(P = 1.00)。
使用重负荷的PAP减轻了HIIE方案产生的急性干扰(下肢力量训练期间的总量),但与单独的SE相比,并没有增加训练量。