Department of Exercise Science, East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Dec;32(12):3333-3339. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001835.
Moir, GL, Munford, SN, Moroski, LL, Davis, SE. The effects of ballistic and nonballistic bench press on mechanical variables. J Strength Cond Res 32(12): 3333-3339, 2018-The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of ballistic and nonballistic bench press performed with loads equivalent to 30 and 90% 1 repetition maximum (1RM) on mechanical variables. Eleven resistance-trained men (age: 23.0 ± 1.4 years; mass: 98.4 ± 14.4 kg) attended 4 testing sessions where they performed one of the following sessions: (a) 3 sets of 5 nonballistic repetitions performed with a load equivalent to 30% 1RM (30N-B), (b) 3 sets of 5 ballistic repetitions performed with a load equivalent to 30% 1RM (30B), (c) 3 sets of 4 nonballistic repetitions with a load equivalent to 90% 1RM (90N-B), or (d) 3 sets of 4 ballistic repetitions with a load equivalent to 90% 1RM (90B). Force plates and a 3-dimensional motion analysis system were used to determine the velocity, force, power output (PO), and work during each repetition. The heavier loads resulted in significantly greater forces applied to the barbell (mean differences: 472-783 N, p < 0.001), but lower barbell velocities (mean differences: 0.85-1.20 m·s, p < 0.001) and PO (mean differences: 118-492 W, p ≤ 0.022). The ballistic conditions enhanced the mechanical variables only at the lower load, with 30B producing significantly greater force (mean difference: 263 N, p < 0.001), velocity (mean difference: 0.33 m·s, p < 0.001), and PO (mean difference: 335 W, p < 0.001) compared with 30N-B. Furthermore, the increase in PO across the 3 sets in 30B was significantly different from all other conditions (p = 0.013). The total mechanical work performed was significantly greater for the conditions with the heavier loads compared with those with the lighter loads (mean differences: 362-5,600 J, p < 0.001) and that performed during the ballistic conditions was significantly greater than that performed during the nonballistic conditions with the same load (mean differences: 945-1,030 J, p < 0.001). Ballistic bench press may be an effective exercise for developing PO, and multiple sets may elicit postactivation potentiation that enhances force production. However, these benefits may be negated at heavier loads.
莫尔,GL,芒福德,SN,莫罗斯基,LL,戴维斯,SE。弹道和非弹道卧推对力学变量的影响。J 力量与条件研究 32(12):3333-3339,2018-本研究的目的是调查使用相当于 30%和 90%1 重复最大重量(1RM)的弹道和非弹道卧推对力学变量的影响。11 名接受过抗阻训练的男性(年龄:23.0±1.4 岁;体重:98.4±14.4kg)参加了 4 次测试,他们进行了以下 4 次测试中的一次:(a)3 组 5 次非弹道重复,使用相当于 30%1RM 的负荷(30N-B),(b)3 组 5 次弹道重复,使用相当于 30%1RM 的负荷(30B),(c)3 组 4 次非弹道重复,使用相当于 90%1RM 的负荷(90N-B),或(d)3 组 4 次弹道重复,使用相当于 90%1RM 的负荷(90B)。力板和三维运动分析系统用于确定每次重复的速度、力、功率输出(PO)和功。较重的负荷导致杠铃上的力明显增大(平均差异:472-783N,p<0.001),但杠铃速度降低(平均差异:0.85-1.20m·s,p<0.001)和 PO(平均差异:118-492W,p≤0.022)。弹道条件仅在较低负荷下增强力学变量,30B 产生的力显著增大(平均差异:263N,p<0.001),速度(平均差异:0.33m·s,p<0.001)和 PO(平均差异:335W,p<0.001)与 30N-B 相比。此外,30B 中 3 组之间 PO 的增加与其他所有条件明显不同(p=0.013)。与较轻负荷相比,较重负荷条件下的总机械功显著增加(平均差异:362-5600J,p<0.001),与相同负荷下的非弹道条件相比,弹道条件下的机械功显著增加(平均差异:945-1030J,p<0.001)。弹道卧推可能是一种有效的 PO 发展运动,多组运动可能会引发后激活增强,从而增强力量产生。然而,在较重的负荷下,这些益处可能会被抵消。