Duff Melissa C, Covington Natalie V, Hilverman Caitlin, Cohen Neal J
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Department of Psychology, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 24;13:471. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00471. eCollection 2019.
Since Tulving proposed a distinction in memory between semantic and episodic memory, considerable effort has been directed towards understanding their similar and unique features. Of particular interest has been the extent to which semantic and episodic memory have a shared dependence on the hippocampus. In contrast to the definitive evidence for the link between hippocampus and episodic memory, the role of the hippocampus in semantic memory has been a topic of considerable debate. This debate stems, in part, from highly variable reports of new semantic memory learning in amnesia ranging from profound impairment to full preservation, and various degrees of deficit and ability in between. More recently, a number of significant advances in experimental methods have occurred, alongside new provocative data on the role of the hippocampus in semantic memory, making this an ideal moment to revisit this debate, to re-evaluate data, methods, and theories, and to synthesize new findings. In line with these advances, this review has two primary goals. First, we provide a historical lens with which to reevaluate and contextualize the literature on semantic memory and the hippocampus. The second goal of this review is to provide a synthesis of new findings on the role of the hippocampus and semantic memory. With the perspective of time and this critical review, we arrive at the interpretation that the hippocampus does indeed make necessary contributions to semantic memory. We argue that semantic memory, like episodic memory, is a highly flexible, (re)constructive, relational and multimodal system, and that there is value in developing methods and materials that fully capture this depth and richness to facilitate comparisons to episodic memory. Such efforts will be critical in addressing questions regarding the cognitive and neural (inter)dependencies among forms of memory, and the role that these forms of memory play in support of cognition more broadly. Such efforts also promise to advance our understanding of how words, concepts, and meaning, as well as episodes and events, are instantiated and maintained in memory and will yield new insights into our two most quintessentially human abilities: memory and language.
自从图尔文提出语义记忆和情景记忆在记忆方面存在区别以来,人们投入了大量精力来理解它们的相似和独特特征。特别令人感兴趣的是语义记忆和情景记忆在多大程度上共同依赖海马体。与海马体和情景记忆之间联系的确凿证据形成对比的是,海马体在语义记忆中的作用一直是一个备受争议的话题。这场争论部分源于对失忆症患者新语义记忆学习的报道高度可变,从严重受损到完全保留,以及介于两者之间的各种程度的缺陷和能力表现。最近,实验方法取得了一些重大进展,同时也出现了关于海马体在语义记忆中作用的新的引发思考的数据,这使得现在成为重新审视这场争论、重新评估数据、方法和理论以及整合新发现的理想时机。与这些进展相一致,本综述有两个主要目标。首先,我们提供一个历史视角,用以重新评估关于语义记忆和海马体的文献并将其置于背景之中。本综述的第二个目标是综合关于海马体和语义记忆作用的新发现。从时间的角度以及这一批判性综述出发,我们得出这样的解释:海马体确实对语义记忆做出了必要贡献。我们认为,语义记忆与情景记忆一样,是一个高度灵活、(可)重构、关联且多模态的系统,开发能够充分捕捉这种深度和丰富性的方法和材料以促进与情景记忆的比较是有价值的。这些努力对于解决关于记忆形式之间的认知和神经(相互)依赖性问题,以及这些记忆形式在更广泛地支持认知方面所起的作用至关重要。这些努力也有望推进我们对单词、概念和意义以及情节和事件如何在记忆中实例化和维持的理解,并将为我们人类最典型的两种能力:记忆和语言带来新的见解。