Oldrati Viola, Bardoni Alessandra, Poggi Geraldina, Urgesi Cosimo
Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:2971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02971. eCollection 2019.
Many existing findings indicate that processing of emotional information is pre-attentive, largely immune from attentional control. Nevertheless, inconsistent evidence on the interference of emotional cues on cognitive processing suggests that this influence may be a highly conditional phenomenon. The aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to examine the modulation of attention control on emotion processing using facial expressions (2) explore the very same effect for emotional body expressions. In Experiment 1, participants performed a Flanker task in which they had to indicate either the emotion (happy/fearful) or the gender of the target stimulus while ignoring the distracting stimuli at the side. We found evidence for intrusion of the emotional dimension of a stimulus in both the emotion and gender discrimination performance, thus when either task-relevant or task-irrelevant. To further explore the influence of attention control mechanisms, in Experiment 2 participants performed a same-or-different judgment task in which they were asked to pay attention to both the central and lateral stimuli and indicated whether the central stimulus matched the lateral for emotion or gender. Results showed that emotional features exerted an influence at an implicit level (i.e., during gender judgments) for bodies only. Gender features did not affect emotional processing in either experiments. To rule out the possibility that this effect was driven by postural rather than emotional features of fearful vs. happy stimuli, a control experiment was conducted. In Experiment 3, bodies with an opening/up-ward or closing/down-ward posture but with no emotional valence were presented. Results revealed that the body posture did not influence gender discrimination. Findings suggest that the emotional valence of a face or body stimulus can overpass attention filtering mechanisms, independently from the level of attentional modulation (Experiment 1). However, broadening the focus of attention to include the lateral stimuli led emotional information to intrude on the main task, exerting an implicit, bottom-up influence on gender processing, only when conveyed by bodies (Experiment 2). Results point to different mechanisms for the implicit processing of face and body emotional expressions, with the latter likely having role on action preparation processes.
许多现有研究结果表明,情绪信息的处理是前注意性的,很大程度上不受注意控制的影响。然而,关于情绪线索对认知处理干扰的证据并不一致,这表明这种影响可能是一种高度依赖条件的现象。本研究的目的有两个:(1)使用面部表情来检验注意控制对情绪处理的调节作用;(2)探究情绪身体表情是否也有同样的效果。在实验1中,参与者执行了一项侧翼任务,在该任务中,他们必须在忽略旁边干扰刺激的同时,指出目标刺激的情绪(开心/恐惧)或性别。我们发现,无论是在情绪辨别任务还是性别辨别任务中,刺激的情绪维度都会干扰任务表现,也就是说,无论是与任务相关还是与任务无关的刺激。为了进一步探究注意控制机制的影响,在实验2中,参与者执行了一项相同或不同判断任务,在该任务中,他们被要求同时关注中央刺激和侧翼刺激,并指出中央刺激在情绪或性别方面是否与侧翼刺激匹配。结果表明,情绪特征仅在身体刺激的情况下,在隐含层面(即性别判断过程中)产生影响。在两个实验中,性别特征均未影响情绪处理。为了排除这种效应是由恐惧与开心刺激的姿势而非情绪特征驱动的可能性,我们进行了一项对照实验。在实验3中,呈现了具有张开/向上或闭合/向下姿势但没有情绪效价的身体。结果显示,身体姿势并未影响性别辨别。研究结果表明,面部或身体刺激的情绪效价可以超越注意过滤机制,且不受注意调节水平的影响(实验1)。然而,将注意焦点扩大到包括侧翼刺激时,情绪信息会干扰主要任务,仅在身体传达情绪信息时,对性别处理产生隐含的、自下而上的影响(实验2)。研究结果指出了面部和身体情绪表情隐含处理的不同机制,后者可能在动作准备过程中发挥作用。