• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么是因果认知?

What Is Causal Cognition?

作者信息

Bender Andrea

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Science, SFF Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour (SapienCE), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;11:3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00003. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00003
PMID:32038436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6987253/
Abstract

While gaining an understanding of cause-effect relations is the key of causal cognition, its are less clearly delineated. Standard approaches in the field focus on how individuals detect, learn, and reason from statistical regularities, thereby prioritizing cognitive processes over content and context. This article calls for a broadened perspective. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of what is going on when humans engage in causal cognition-including its application to machine cognition-it is argued, we also need to take into account the content that informs the processing, the means and mechanisms of knowledge accumulation and transmission, and the cultural context in which both accumulation and transmission take place.

摘要

虽然理解因果关系是因果认知的关键,但其边界却不太清晰。该领域的标准方法侧重于个体如何从统计规律中进行检测、学习和推理,从而将认知过程置于内容和背景之上。本文呼吁采用更广阔的视角。为了更全面地理解人类进行因果认知时所发生的情况——包括其在机器认知中的应用——有人认为,我们还需要考虑为处理提供信息的内容、知识积累和传播的方式及机制,以及积累和传播发生的文化背景。

相似文献

1
What Is Causal Cognition?什么是因果认知?
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;11:3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00003. eCollection 2020.
2
Probing the Cultural Constitution of Causal Cognition - A Research Program.探究因果认知的文化构成——一项研究计划
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 23;7:245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00245. eCollection 2016.
3
The Cultural Fabric of Human Causal Cognition.人类因果认知的文化结构。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):922-940. doi: 10.1177/1745691619863055. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
[Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: a new cognitive approach to psychopathology].[饮食失调患者分类过程的研究:精神病理学的一种新认知方法]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82376-0.
5
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
6
Building a bridge-an archeologist's perspective on the evolution of causal cognition.搭建一座桥梁——一位考古学家对因果认知演变的见解
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 17;5:1472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01472. eCollection 2014.
7
Processing of positive-causal and negative-causal coherence relations in primary school children and adults: a test of the cumulative cognitive complexity approach in German.小学生和成年人对积极因果关系和消极因果关系连贯关系的处理:德语中累积认知复杂性方法的一项测试
J Child Lang. 2017 Mar;44(2):297-328. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000872. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
8
On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.论认知能力与风险偏好的关系。
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):115-34.
9
Cognition is … Fundamentally Cultural.认知……从根本上说是文化的。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2013 Jan 4;3(1):42-54. doi: 10.3390/bs3010042. eCollection 2013 Mar.
10
Thinking or feeling? An exploratory study of maternal scaffolding, child mental state talk, and emotion understanding in language-impaired and typically developing school-aged children.思考还是感受?语言障碍和正常发展的学龄儿童的母亲支架、儿童心理状态谈话和情绪理解的探索性研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Jun;88(2):261-283. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12194. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of object permanence, short-term spatial memory, causality, understanding of object properties and gravity across five different ungulate species.跨五个不同有蹄类物种的客体永久性、短期空间记忆、因果关系、物体属性和重力理解的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64396-8.
2
Evaluating the Application of the Mental Model Mapping Tool (M-Tool).评估心智模型映射工具(M工具)的应用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 14;12:761882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761882. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cultural Fabric of Human Causal Cognition.人类因果认知的文化结构。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):922-940. doi: 10.1177/1745691619863055. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
2
The Role of Culture and Evolution for Human Cognition.文化和进化对人类认知的作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;12(4):1403-1420. doi: 10.1111/tops.12449. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Will human-like machines make human-like mistakes?类人机器会犯类似人类的错误吗?
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e270. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1700019X.
4
Avoiding frostbite: It helps to learn from others.避免冻伤:向他人学习很有帮助。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e279. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000280.
5
Thinking like animals or thinking like colleagues?像动物一样思考,还是像同事一样思考?
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e263. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000127.
6
Children begin with the same start-up software, but their software updates are cultural.儿童拥有相同的初始软件,但他们的软件更新是文化性的。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e260. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000097.
7
Agents and Patients in Physical Settings: Linguistic Cues Affect the Assignment of Causality in German and Tongan.物理环境中的施事和受事:语言线索对德语和汤加语中因果关系归属的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 7;8:1093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01093. eCollection 2017.
8
Tracking the evolution of causal cognition in humans.追踪人类因果认知的演变。
J Anthropol Sci. 2017 Dec 30;95:219-234. doi: 10.4436/JASS.95006. Epub 2017 May 8.
9
Grounding principles for inferring agency: Two cultural perspectives.推断能动性的基础原则:两种文化视角。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jun;95:50-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
10
Conceptualizing agency: Folkpsychological and folkcommunicative perspectives on plants.对能动性的概念化:关于植物的民间心理学和民间交流视角
Cognition. 2017 May;162:103-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Feb 20.