• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗宫颈癌患者中危及器官体积剂量的评估以及基于CT的计划与传统计划的比较。

Evaluation of Volumetric Doses of Organs at Risk in Carcinoma Cervix Patients with HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy and Comparison of CT-based and Conventional Plans.

作者信息

Srivastava S, Painuly N K, Mishra S P, Srivastava K, Singh N, Singh S, Bhatt M L B

机构信息

MSc, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, King George's Medical University,Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

PhD, Professor of Medical Physics, Department of Radiotherapy King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019 Dec 1;9(6):603-612. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.867. eCollection 2019 Dec.

DOI:10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.867
PMID:32039090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6943852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy treatment planning in cervix carcinoma patients using two dimensional (2D) orthogonal images provides only point dose estimates while CT-based planning provides volumetric dose assessment helping in understanding the correlation between morbidity and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) and treatment volume.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of present study is to compare International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 38 (ICRU 38) reference point doses to OARs with volumetric doses using 2D images and CT images in patients with cervical cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 20 patients with cervical cancer stages (IIB-IIIB) were planned for a brachytherapy dose of 7Gy per fraction for three fractions using 2D image-based treatment plan and CT-based plan. ICRU 38 points for bladder and rectum were identified on both 2D image-based plan and CT-based plan and doses (D) at these points were compared to the minimum dose to 2cc volume (D) of bladder and rectum receiving the highest dose.

RESULTS

D bladder dose was 1.60 (±0.67) times more than D bladder dose whereas D rectum dose was 1.13±0.40 times D. Significant difference was found between D and D dose for bladder (p=.0.016) while no significant difference was seen between D and D dose for rectum (p=0.964).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that ICRU 38 point doses are not the true representation of maximum doses to OARs. CT-based treatment planning is more a reliable tool for OAR dose assessment than the conventional 2D radiograph-based plan.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌患者使用二维(2D)正交图像进行近距离放射治疗计划时,仅提供点剂量估计,而基于CT的计划可提供体积剂量评估,有助于理解发病率与危及器官(OARs)剂量及治疗体积之间的相关性。

目的

本研究的目的是比较宫颈癌患者使用2D图像和CT图像时,国际辐射单位与测量委员会第38号报告(ICRU 38)中OARs参考点剂量与体积剂量。

材料与方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,20例宫颈癌(IIB-IIIB期)患者计划采用基于2D图像的治疗计划和基于CT的计划,进行每次7Gy、共三次分割的近距离放射治疗。在基于2D图像的计划和基于CT的计划上均确定膀胱和直肠的ICRU 38点,并将这些点的剂量(D)与接受最高剂量的膀胱和直肠2cc体积的最小剂量(D)进行比较。

结果

膀胱D剂量比膀胱D剂量高1.60(±0.67)倍,而直肠D剂量是D的1.13±0.40倍。膀胱D与D剂量之间存在显著差异(p = 0.016),而直肠D与D剂量之间无显著差异(p = 0.964)。

结论

该研究表明,ICRU 38点剂量并非OARs最大剂量的真实代表。基于CT的治疗计划比传统的基于2D射线照片的计划更可靠,是OAR剂量评估的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/7c7e1a2f577e/JBPE-9-603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/eb7142a27e77/JBPE-9-603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/f326e4b31493/JBPE-9-603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/9e8e045213f4/JBPE-9-603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/71b6406e9109/JBPE-9-603-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/7c7e1a2f577e/JBPE-9-603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/eb7142a27e77/JBPE-9-603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/f326e4b31493/JBPE-9-603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/9e8e045213f4/JBPE-9-603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/71b6406e9109/JBPE-9-603-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d2/6943852/7c7e1a2f577e/JBPE-9-603-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Volumetric Doses of Organs at Risk in Carcinoma Cervix Patients with HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy and Comparison of CT-based and Conventional Plans.高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗宫颈癌患者中危及器官体积剂量的评估以及基于CT的计划与传统计划的比较。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019 Dec 1;9(6):603-612. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.867. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.基于CT的宫颈癌腔内近距离放射治疗三维治疗计划:直肠和膀胱的剂量体积直方图与ICRU点剂量比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(13):5259-64. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.13.5259.
3
2D to 3D Evaluation of Organs at Risk Doses in Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌腔内近距离放疗中危及器官剂量的二维到三维评估
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2010 Mar;2(1):37-43. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2010.13721. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
4
Comparison between DVH-based doses and ICRU point-based doses to the rectum and the bladder using CT-based high-dose rate brachytherapy to the cervix.使用基于CT的高剂量率近距离放射治疗子宫颈时,基于剂量体积直方图(DVH)的剂量与基于国际辐射单位与测量委员会(ICRU)点的直肠和膀胱剂量之间的比较。
Med Dosim. 2018;43(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
Comparison of 2D vs. 3D dosimetry for Rotte 'Y' applicator high dose rate brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer.用于医学上无法手术的子宫内膜癌的Rotte‘Y’施源器高剂量率近距离放射治疗的二维与三维剂量测定比较
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Oct;5(5):521-7. doi: 10.1177/153303460600500509.
6
Evaluation of variation of interfraction doses to organs at risk during brachytherapy of cervical cancer.宫颈癌近距离放射治疗期间危及器官分次剂量变化的评估。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2020 Apr;76(2):201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
Comparative evaluation of two-dimensional radiography and three dimensional computed tomography based dose-volume parameters for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer: a prospective study.基于二维放射摄影和三维计算机断层扫描的剂量体积参数在宫颈癌高剂量率腔内近距离放疗中的比较评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4717-21. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4717.
8
Non isocentric film-based intracavitary brachytherapy planning in cervical cancer: a retrospective dosimetric analysis with CT planning.宫颈癌非等中心基于胶片的腔内近距离放射治疗计划:CT计划的回顾性剂量分析
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2012 Sep;4(3):129-34. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2012.30678. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
9
A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.宫颈癌近距离治疗中危及器官(OARs)的ICRU点剂量与体积剂量比较。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jun;55(3):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02272.x.
10
Dosimetric evaluation of rectum and bladder using image-based CT planning and orthogonal radiographs with ICRU 38 recommendations in intracavitary brachytherapy.在腔内近距离放射治疗中,使用基于图像的CT计划和正交射线照片,并依据ICRU 38建议对直肠和膀胱进行剂量学评估。
J Med Phys. 2008 Jan;33(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.39417.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiobiological and dosimetric comparison of 60Co versus 192Ir high-dose-rate intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.60Co 与 192Ir 高剂量率腔内间质近距离治疗宫颈癌的放射生物学和剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Dec 13;17(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02170-8.
2
Volume Delineation in Cervical Cancer With T2 and Diffusion-weighted MRI: Agreement on Volumes Between Observers.宫颈癌 T2 及弥散加权 MRI 中的体积勾画:观察者间体积勾画的一致性。
In Vivo. 2020 Jul-Aug;34(4):1981-1986. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11995.

本文引用的文献

1
2D to 3D Evaluation of Organs at Risk Doses in Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌腔内近距离放疗中危及器官剂量的二维到三维评估
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2010 Mar;2(1):37-43. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2010.13721. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
2
CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.基于CT的宫颈癌腔内近距离放射治疗三维治疗计划:直肠和膀胱的剂量体积直方图与ICRU点剂量比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(13):5259-64. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.13.5259.
3
Comparative evaluation of two-dimensional radiography and three dimensional computed tomography based dose-volume parameters for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer: a prospective study.
基于二维放射摄影和三维计算机断层扫描的剂量体积参数在宫颈癌高剂量率腔内近距离放疗中的比较评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4717-21. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4717.
4
CT or MRI for image-based brachytherapy in cervical cancer.CT 或 MRI 用于宫颈癌的图像引导近距离放疗。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr;42(4):309-13. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys010. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
5
Additional rectal and sigmoid mucosal points and doses in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix: a dosimetric study.宫颈癌高剂量率腔内近距离放疗中直肠和乙状结肠黏膜额外布点及剂量的剂量学研究
J Cancer Res Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;7(3):298-303. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.87027.
6
A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.宫颈癌近距离治疗中危及器官(OARs)的ICRU点剂量与体积剂量比较。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jun;55(3):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02272.x.
7
Dosimetric evaluation of rectum and bladder using image-based CT planning and orthogonal radiographs with ICRU 38 recommendations in intracavitary brachytherapy.在腔内近距离放射治疗中,使用基于图像的CT计划和正交射线照片,并依据ICRU 38建议对直肠和膀胱进行剂量学评估。
J Med Phys. 2008 Jan;33(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.39417.
8
Comparison of conventional and CT-based planning for intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: target volume coverage and organs at risk doses.宫颈癌腔内近距离放射治疗传统计划与基于CT的计划比较:靶区覆盖和危及器官剂量
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;28(1):95. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-95.
9
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours.宫颈癌近距离放疗中基于计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像的轮廓勾画:一项前瞻性试验的结果及标准化轮廓的初步指南
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.021. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
10
CT-guided intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Comparison of conventional point A plan with clinical target volume-based three-dimensional plan using dose-volume parameters.CT引导下宫颈癌腔内放疗:基于剂量体积参数的传统A点计划与基于临床靶区的三维计划的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.015. Epub 2005 Sep 19.