Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardio-Thoracic Unit, Pessac, France.
IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Bordeaux University, Pessac, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):332-340. doi: 10.1111/pace.13883. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Loss of biventricular stimulation can result in nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Problems associated with the left ventricular (LV) lead and LV sensing can be challenging to detect and their incidence is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate mechanisms of loss of biventricular pacing due to LV lead- and LV sensing-associated problems.
In this bicentric study, CRT patients were surveilled using a novel remote monitoring algorithm from Biotronik (Germany) that registers LV electrograms (EGMs) during intermittent loss of resynchronization. The episodes were analyzed to assess the mechanisms of resynchronization interruptions.
We analyzed 582 EGMs from 61 patients. During a median follow-up of 6 months, 59% of the patients had such episodes. The majority of the episodes (61%) were related to inappropriate inhibition of LV pacing, mostly due to upper rate lock-in caused by LV sensing (58%). In contrast, 8% of episodes showed intermittent loss of LV capture, which was identified thanks to LV sensing. The remaining 31% of episodes were due to physiological reasons for resynchronization interruptions (eg, supraventricular tachycardia [18%], premature beats [8%], and others [5%]). Patients with CRT interruption episodes had lower resynchronization rates (median: 98.5% vs 100%, P = .044).
Inadequate programming (active LV sensing with T-wave protection) is the main cause of impaired resynchronization in devices with LV sensing. In general, we recommend the deactivation of the LV T-wave protection function.
双心室起搏丧失可导致心脏再同步治疗(CRT)无应答。与左心室(LV)导联和 LV 感知相关的问题可能难以检测,其发生率尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨由于 LV 导联和 LV 感知相关问题导致双心室起搏丧失的机制。
在这项双中心研究中,使用 Biotronik(德国)的一种新的远程监测算法对 CRT 患者进行监测,该算法在间歇性失去再同步时记录 LV 心内电图(EGM)。分析这些发作以评估再同步中断的机制。
我们分析了 61 例患者的 582 个 EGM。在中位随访 6 个月期间,59%的患者出现了这种发作。大多数发作(61%)与 LV 起搏的不当抑制有关,主要是由于 LV 感知引起的上限锁定(58%)。相比之下,8%的发作显示间歇性 LV 捕获丢失,这是由于 LV 感知而发现的。其余 31%的发作是由于再同步中断的生理原因(例如,室上性心动过速[18%]、早搏[8%]和其他[5%])。出现 CRT 中断发作的患者的再同步率较低(中位数:98.5%比 100%,P=0.044)。
不适当的程控(带 T 波保护的主动 LV 感知)是具有 LV 感知功能的设备中再同步受损的主要原因。一般来说,我们建议停用 LV T 波保护功能。