Myint O, Sriplung H, San C C, Chongsuvivatwong V
Department of Public Health, Pathein, Ayeyarwady Region, Myanmar.
Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Public Health Action. 2019 Dec 21;9(4):182-185. doi: 10.5588/pha.19.0028.
In routine contact investigation in Myanmar, basic health staff conduct home visits and symptom screening among household contacts before investigation. We supplemented this with follow-up telephone calls by programme nurses inviting all contacts to be screened. The staff identified 376 contacts, 4 with symptoms, 3 of whom presented, including 1 with tuberculosis (TB). Due to the second intervention, 264 of the remaining 373 contacts received screening and 17 additional cases were detected. The additional cost incurred by the second intervention was 4.3 times higher than that of the conventional method, but TB yield was increased by a factor of 17.
在缅甸进行的常规接触者调查中,基层卫生工作人员在调查前对家庭接触者进行家访和症状筛查。我们通过项目护士进行后续电话随访,邀请所有接触者接受筛查,以此作为补充。工作人员识别出376名接触者,其中4人有症状,3人前来就诊,包括1例结核病患者。由于第二次干预措施,其余373名接触者中有264人接受了筛查,并检测出另外17例病例。第二次干预措施产生的额外成本比传统方法高4.3倍,但结核病检出率提高了17倍。