Suppr超能文献

家庭接触者调查在巴基斯坦发现结核病的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of household contact investigation for detection of tuberculosis in Pakistan.

机构信息

Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Interactive Research and Development (IRD) Global, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 22;11(10):e049658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049658.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite WHO guidelines recommending household contact investigation, and studies showing the impact of active screening, most tuberculosis (TB) programmes in resource-limited settings only carry out passive contact investigation. The cost of such strategies is often cited as barriers to their implementation. However, little data are available for the additional costs required to implement this strategy. We aimed to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of active contact investigation as compared with passive contact investigation in urban Pakistan.

METHODS

We estimated the cost-effectiveness of 'enhanced' (passive with follow-up) and 'active' (household visit) contact investigations compared with standard 'passive' contact investigation from providers and the programme's perspective using a simple decision tree. Costs were collected in Pakistan from a TB clinic performing passive contact investigation and from studies of active contact tracing interventions conducted. The effectiveness was based on the number of patients with TB identified among household contacts screened.

RESULTS

The addition of enhanced contact investigation to the existing passive mode detected 3.8 times more cases of TB per index patient compared with passive contact investigation alone. The incremental cost was US$30 per index patient, which yielded an incremental cost of US$120 per incremental patient identified with TB. The active contact investigation was 1.5 times more effective than enhanced contact investigation with an incremental cost of US$238 per incremental patient with TB identified.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that enhanced and active approaches to contact investigation effectively identify additional patients with TB among household contacts at a relatively modest cost. These strategies can be added to the passive contact investigation in a high burden setting to find the people with TB who are missed and meet the End TB strategy goals.

摘要

目的

尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)指南建议进行家庭接触者调查,并开展了有关主动筛查影响的研究,但资源有限环境下的大多数结核病(TB)规划仅开展被动接触者调查。此类策略的成本常被认为是其实施的障碍。然而,对于实施这一策略所需的额外成本,数据却很少。我们旨在评估在资源有限的巴基斯坦城市,主动接触者调查相对于被动接触者调查的成本效益。

方法

我们从提供者和项目的角度,使用简单决策树分别估计了“增强型”(被动随访)和“主动型”(家访)接触者调查与标准“被动”接触者调查相比的成本效益。成本是从正在进行被动接触者调查的 TB 诊所和主动接触者追踪干预研究中收集的。效果基于筛查出的家庭接触者中发现的 TB 患者数量。

结果

与单纯的被动接触者调查相比,增强型接触者调查额外发现了 3.8 倍的 TB 患者。增量成本为每位索引患者 30 美元,这使得每发现一位新增的 TB 患者,增量成本为 120 美元。主动接触者调查比增强型接触者调查更有效,每发现一位新增的 TB 患者,增量成本为 238 美元。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,强化和主动接触者调查方法可在相对较低的成本下,有效地从家庭接触者中发现更多的 TB 患者。这些策略可以在高负担环境中与被动接触者调查一起使用,以找到那些被遗漏的 TB 患者,并实现终结结核病战略目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/844b/8543626/2d9db3024046/bmjopen-2021-049658f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验