Chen Hui-Jin, Jin Ying, Shen Li-Jun, Wang Yi, Li Zhi-Yong, Fang Xiao-Yun, Wang Zhi-Liang, Huang Xu-Dong, Wang Zhi-Jun, Ma Zhi-Zhong
Department of ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):726. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.20.
Closure of traumatic macular hole (TMH) can be achieved spontaneously or by surgical intervention. Thus far, there exist no prospective comparative studies that have analyzed the difference between the two modalities. This study aimed to compare the anatomical and visual recovery of eyes with TMH following either an immediate vitrectomy or six-month observation.
This was a multicenter prospective comparative study. Eight centers participated in the study. Patient data from 40 eyes with a recent history of blunt ocular trauma and newly formed full-thickness TMH were recruited in this study. The participating patients selected between an early vitrectomy or a six-month observation after a doctor explained the potential benefits and risks of both strategies in an unbiased manner. Twenty-five patients underwent an immediate vitrectomy, and 15 patients received six-month observation. Patients were assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
Closure rates were 66.7% for the observational group, and 100% for the surgical group (P=0.002). There were no vision-threatening ocular complications in both groups. For the observational group, the mean closure time was 2.5±1.6 months, and 80% of the hole closure occurred within 3 months; cystic edema on the edge of the hole at baseline was significantly more frequent in the non-closed subgroup than in the closed subgroup (P=0.03). There were no significant differences in the foveal microstructure and in the final visual outcome between the spontaneously closed cases and the surgically closed cases.
TMH had a moderately high incidence of spontaneous closure, but an immediate vitrectomy achieved an even higher closure rate. Vitrectomy was effective and safe to treat TMH, while a 3-month observation for spontaneous closure may be an alternative modality for TMH management. Cystic edema on the edge of the hole may be an unfavorable factor for the spontaneous closure of TMH.
创伤性黄斑裂孔(TMH)可自发闭合或通过手术干预实现闭合。迄今为止,尚无前瞻性对照研究分析这两种方式之间的差异。本研究旨在比较TMH患者在接受即刻玻璃体切割术或六个月观察期后的解剖结构恢复情况和视力恢复情况。
这是一项多中心前瞻性对照研究。八个中心参与了该研究。本研究纳入了40只近期有钝性眼外伤史且新形成全层TMH的患眼的患者数据。参与研究的患者在医生以无偏倚的方式解释了两种治疗策略的潜在益处和风险后,选择早期玻璃体切割术或六个月观察期。25例患者接受了即刻玻璃体切割术,15例患者接受了六个月观察。通过频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)对患者进行评估。
观察组的闭合率为66.7%,手术组为100%(P = 0.002)。两组均未出现威胁视力的眼部并发症。观察组的平均闭合时间为2.5±1.6个月,80%的裂孔在3个月内闭合;基线时裂孔边缘的囊样水肿在未闭合亚组中比在闭合亚组中更常见(P = 0.03)。自发闭合病例和手术闭合病例在黄斑微结构和最终视力结果方面无显著差异。
TMH自发闭合的发生率中等偏高,但即刻玻璃体切割术可实现更高的闭合率。玻璃体切割术治疗TMH有效且安全,而3个月的自发闭合观察期可能是TMH治疗的另一种方式。裂孔边缘的囊样水肿可能是TMH自发闭合的不利因素。