Hang Hualian, Jeong Seogsong, Sha Meng, Kong Defu, Xi Zhifeng, Tong Ying, Xia Qiang
Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):744. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.37.
Anatomical location is considered in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, disparities and its extents in proportion of surgical candidates, prognostic factors, prognostic genetic networks, susceptibility for lymph node dissection, and disease stage at diagnosis remain to be confirmed.
A total of 11,710 patients with cholangiocarcinoma from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cancer Registries (SEER) and 45 CCA patients with paired tumor and normal specimens from The Cancer Genome Atlas were studied. Kaplan-Meier estimation, Cox proportional hazards regression, Pearson's correlation, comparison between anatomical location (distal, intrahepatic, and perihilar)-dependent CCAs, differential expressive gene stratification, potential interactive gene identification, and confirmation on pathways of the prognostic networks were carried out.
Survival outcomes were most favorable in the distal type, followed by perihilar and intrahepatic types, but postsurgical prognosis was slightly higher in intrahepatic type compared to perihilar type. Distant historic stage at diagnosis was noticed in intrahepatic type. Significant prognostic factors and their hazards ratios were dependent to the anatomical location. In addition, lymph node dissection provided significant survival benefits in perihilar type only. Furthermore, prognosis-predictive genes, as well as potential processes and pathways, were significantly among the anatomical location-dependent types that the genes barely overlapped.
There are disparities in almost all aspects among distal, intrahepatic, and perihilar CCAs. Anatomical location needs to be considered in treatment, prognostic estimation, identifying targets, and developing therapeutic approaches for CCA.
在胆管癌(CCA)的诊断和治疗方法中会考虑解剖位置。然而,在手术候选者比例、预后因素、预后遗传网络、淋巴结清扫易感性以及诊断时的疾病分期方面的差异及其程度仍有待确定。
对监测、流行病学和最终结果癌症登记处(SEER)的11710例胆管癌患者以及来自癌症基因组图谱的45例配对肿瘤和正常标本的CCA患者进行了研究。进行了Kaplan-Meier估计、Cox比例风险回归、Pearson相关性分析、不同解剖位置(远端、肝内和肝门周围)依赖性CCA之间的比较、差异表达基因分层、潜在相互作用基因鉴定以及对预后网络途径的确认。
生存结果在远端型中最为有利,其次是肝门周围型和肝内型,但肝内型手术后的预后略高于肝门周围型。肝内型在诊断时远处历史分期较高。显著的预后因素及其风险比取决于解剖位置。此外,淋巴结清扫仅在肝门周围型中提供了显著的生存益处。此外,预后预测基因以及潜在的过程和途径在解剖位置依赖性类型之间存在显著差异,这些基因几乎没有重叠。
远端、肝内和肝门周围CCA在几乎所有方面都存在差异。在CCA的治疗、预后评估、确定靶点和开发治疗方法时需要考虑解剖位置。