Suppr超能文献

辽宁评分预测肝硬化食管静脉曲张的外部验证:一项中国多中心横断面研究

External validation of Liaoning score for predicting esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis: a Chinese multicenter cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Li Qianqian, Wu Yunhai, Zhu Qiang, Meng Fanping, Lin Su, Liu Bang, Li Bimin, Tang Shanhong, Yang Yida, Li Yiling, Yuan Shanshan, Chen Yu, Qi Xingshun

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110840, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang, Shenyang 110006, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):755. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.78.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our previous study developed Liaoning score as a non-invasive approach for predicting esophageal varices (EVs) in liver cirrhosis. This nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to externally validate the diagnostic accuracy of Liaoning score and further evaluate its performance for predicting high-risk EVs.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) without history of endoscopic variceal therapy who underwent endoscopic examinations at their admissions were included. Liaoning score and several non-invasive liver fibrosis scores, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), AST to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), King, and Lok scores, were evaluated. Area under curves (AUCs), cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 612 patients were included. The prevalence of EVs and high-risk EVs was 96.2% and 95.6%, respectively. In overall patients, the AUCs of Liaoning score for predicting EVs and high-risk EVs were higher than non-invasive liver fibrosis scores (0.737 versus 0.626-0.721; 0.734 versus 0.611-0.719). The cut-off value of Liaoning score for high-risk EVs was 0.477 with a sensitivity of 81.96% and a specificity of 65.22%. In patients with hematemesis, Liaoning score could significantly predict EVs and high-risk EVs (AUCs =0.708 and 0.702, respectively), but not non-invasive liver fibrosis scores. The cut-off value of Liaoning score for high-risk EVs was 0.437 with a sensitivity of 83.16% and a specificity of 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Liaoning score should be a non-invasive alternative for predicting EVs and high-risk EVs in cirrhotic patients with acute GIB.

摘要

背景

我们之前的研究开发了辽宁评分法,作为一种预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张(EVs)的非侵入性方法。这项全国性多中心横断面研究旨在对辽宁评分法的诊断准确性进行外部验证,并进一步评估其预测高危EVs的性能。

方法

纳入因急性胃肠道出血(GIB)入院且既往无内镜下静脉曲张治疗史的肝硬化患者,这些患者在入院时接受了内镜检查。评估了辽宁评分法以及几种非侵入性肝纤维化评分,包括天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)与血小板比值指数(APRI)、AST与丙氨酸转氨酶比值(AAR)、纤维化4指数(FIB-4)、King评分和Lok评分。计算曲线下面积(AUCs)、临界值、敏感性和特异性。

结果

总共纳入了612例患者。EVs和高危EVs的患病率分别为96.2%和95.6%。在所有患者中,辽宁评分法预测EVs和高危EVs的AUCs高于非侵入性肝纤维化评分(分别为0.737对0.626 - 0.721;0.734对0.611 - 0.719)。高危EVs的辽宁评分法临界值为0.477,敏感性为81.96%,特异性为65.22%。在呕血患者中,辽宁评分法能够显著预测EVs和高危EVs(AUCs分别为0.708和0.702),但非侵入性肝纤维化评分则不能。高危EVs的辽宁评分法临界值为0.437,敏感性为83.16%,特异性为60%。

结论

辽宁评分法应是预测急性GIB肝硬化患者EVs和高危EVs的一种非侵入性替代方法。

相似文献

5
Prediction of esophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
J Investig Med. 2016 Mar;64(3):745-51. doi: 10.1136/jim-2015-000047. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
Predictors of esophageal varices and first variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis patients.
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 14;23(26):4806-4814. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4806.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Portal Vein Flow Velocity for Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotic Patients.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 16;15(8):e43592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43592. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Non-invasive Fibrosis Markers for Predicting Esophageal Varices: A Potential Alternative to Endoscopic Screening.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 19;16(3):e56433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56433. eCollection 2024 Mar.

引用本文的文献

2
Association Between Bowel Wall Thickening and Long-Term Outcomes in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis.
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2217-2232. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02690-z. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
Validation of the EVendo score for the prediction of varices in cirrhotic patients.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep-Oct;28(5):378-384. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_624_21.
5
Effect of Body Mass Index on the Prognosis of Liver Cirrhosis.
Front Nutr. 2021 Aug 20;8:700132. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.700132. eCollection 2021.
6
CT-scan Based Liver and Spleen Volume Measurement as a Prognostic Indicator for Patients with Cirrhosis.
Am J Med Sci. 2021 Sep;362(3):252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.10.031. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

2
Downhill esophageal varices: a therapeutic dilemma.
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Dec;6(23):463. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.11.13.
3
Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018.
Gut. 2018 Oct;67(10):1757-1768. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316276. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Screening and Surveillance of Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):26-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
6
Severity and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Bloody Vs. Coffee-Grounds Hematemesis.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;113(3):358-366. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.5. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
7
A novel scoring system for prediction of esophageal varices in critically ill patients.
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 7;10:315-325. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S144700. eCollection 2017.
9
Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease.
Liver Int. 2017 Jun;37(6):778-793. doi: 10.1111/liv.13317. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验