Li Qianqian, Wu Yunhai, Zhu Qiang, Meng Fanping, Lin Su, Liu Bang, Li Bimin, Tang Shanhong, Yang Yida, Li Yiling, Yuan Shanshan, Chen Yu, Qi Xingshun
Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110840, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang, Shenyang 110006, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):755. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.78.
Our previous study developed Liaoning score as a non-invasive approach for predicting esophageal varices (EVs) in liver cirrhosis. This nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to externally validate the diagnostic accuracy of Liaoning score and further evaluate its performance for predicting high-risk EVs.
Cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) without history of endoscopic variceal therapy who underwent endoscopic examinations at their admissions were included. Liaoning score and several non-invasive liver fibrosis scores, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), AST to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), King, and Lok scores, were evaluated. Area under curves (AUCs), cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.
Overall, 612 patients were included. The prevalence of EVs and high-risk EVs was 96.2% and 95.6%, respectively. In overall patients, the AUCs of Liaoning score for predicting EVs and high-risk EVs were higher than non-invasive liver fibrosis scores (0.737 versus 0.626-0.721; 0.734 versus 0.611-0.719). The cut-off value of Liaoning score for high-risk EVs was 0.477 with a sensitivity of 81.96% and a specificity of 65.22%. In patients with hematemesis, Liaoning score could significantly predict EVs and high-risk EVs (AUCs =0.708 and 0.702, respectively), but not non-invasive liver fibrosis scores. The cut-off value of Liaoning score for high-risk EVs was 0.437 with a sensitivity of 83.16% and a specificity of 60%.
Liaoning score should be a non-invasive alternative for predicting EVs and high-risk EVs in cirrhotic patients with acute GIB.
我们之前的研究开发了辽宁评分法,作为一种预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张(EVs)的非侵入性方法。这项全国性多中心横断面研究旨在对辽宁评分法的诊断准确性进行外部验证,并进一步评估其预测高危EVs的性能。
纳入因急性胃肠道出血(GIB)入院且既往无内镜下静脉曲张治疗史的肝硬化患者,这些患者在入院时接受了内镜检查。评估了辽宁评分法以及几种非侵入性肝纤维化评分,包括天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)与血小板比值指数(APRI)、AST与丙氨酸转氨酶比值(AAR)、纤维化4指数(FIB-4)、King评分和Lok评分。计算曲线下面积(AUCs)、临界值、敏感性和特异性。
总共纳入了612例患者。EVs和高危EVs的患病率分别为96.2%和95.6%。在所有患者中,辽宁评分法预测EVs和高危EVs的AUCs高于非侵入性肝纤维化评分(分别为0.737对0.626 - 0.721;0.734对0.611 - 0.719)。高危EVs的辽宁评分法临界值为0.477,敏感性为81.96%,特异性为65.22%。在呕血患者中,辽宁评分法能够显著预测EVs和高危EVs(AUCs分别为0.708和0.702),但非侵入性肝纤维化评分则不能。高危EVs的辽宁评分法临界值为0.437,敏感性为83.16%,特异性为60%。
辽宁评分法应是预测急性GIB肝硬化患者EVs和高危EVs的一种非侵入性替代方法。