Nakase-Richardson Risa, Dahdah Marie N, Almeida Emily, Ricketti Peter, Silva Marc A, Calero Karel, Magalang Ulysses, Schwartz Daniel J
Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida.
Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center at James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Jun 15;16(6):879-888. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8352.
The objective of this study was to compare obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), demographic, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) characteristics across the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and Centers for Medicare and Medicare (CMS) scoring rules in moderate to severe TBI undergoing inpatient neurorehabilitation.
This is a secondary analysis from a prospective clinical trial of sleep apnea at 6 TBI Model System study sites (n = 248). Scoring was completed by a centralized center using both the AASM and CMS criteria for OSA. Hospitalization and injury characteristics were abstracted from the medical record, and demographics were obtained by interview by trained research assistants using TBI Model System standard procedures.
OSA was prevalent using the AASM (66%) and CMS (41.5%) criteria with moderate to strong agreement (weighted κ = 0.64; 95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.70). Significant differences were observed for participants meeting AASM and CMS criteria (concordant group) compared with those meeting criteria for AASM but not CMS (discordant group). At an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 events/h, the discordant group (n = 61) had lower Emergency Department Glasgow Coma Scale Scores consistent with greater injury severity (median, 5 vs 13; P = .0050), younger age (median, 38 vs 58; P < .0001), and lower body mass index (median, 22.1 vs 24.8; P = .0007) compared with the concordant group (n = 103). At an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h, female sex but no other differences were noted, possibly because of the smaller sample size.
The underestimation of sleep apnea using CMS criteria is consistent with prior literature; however, this is the first study to report the impact of the criteria in persons with moderate to severe TBI during a critical stage of neural recovery. Management of comorbidities in TBI has become an increasing focus for optimizing TBI outcomes. Given the chronic morbidity after moderate to severe TBI, the impact of CMS policy for OSA diagnosis for persons with chronic disability and young age are considerable.
Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Comparison of Sleep Apnea Assessment Strategies to Maximize TBI Rehabilitation Participation and Outcome; Identifier: NCT03033901.
本研究的目的是比较美国睡眠医学会(AASM)和医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的评分规则在中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)住院神经康复患者中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)、人口统计学特征和创伤性脑损伤特征的差异。
这是一项对6个TBI模型系统研究地点(n = 248)的睡眠呼吸暂停前瞻性临床试验的二次分析。由一个集中中心使用AASM和CMS的OSA标准完成评分。从病历中提取住院和损伤特征,并由经过培训的研究助理按照TBI模型系统标准程序通过访谈获取人口统计学信息。
使用AASM标准(66%)和CMS标准(41.5%)时OSA均较为普遍,两者有中度至高度一致性(加权κ = 0.64;95%置信区间 = 0.58 - 0.70)。与符合AASM但不符合CMS标准的参与者(不一致组)相比,符合AASM和CMS标准的参与者(一致组)存在显著差异。在呼吸暂停低通气指数≥5次/小时时,不一致组(n = 61)的急诊科格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较低,表明损伤更严重(中位数,5 vs 13;P = 0.0050),年龄更小(中位数,38 vs 58;P < 0.0001),体重指数更低(中位数,22.1 vs 24.8;P = 0.0007),而一致组(n = 103)则不然。在呼吸暂停低通气指数≥15次/小时时,仅观察到女性性别差异,其他差异未被发现,这可能是由于样本量较小。
使用CMS标准对睡眠呼吸暂停的低估与先前的文献一致;然而,这是第一项报告该标准在神经恢复关键阶段对中度至重度TBI患者影响的研究。TBI合并症的管理已成为优化TBI治疗结果日益关注的焦点。鉴于中度至重度TBI后的慢性发病率,CMS关于OSA诊断的政策对慢性残疾和年轻患者的影响相当大。
注册机构:ClinicalTrials.gov;名称:比较睡眠呼吸暂停评估策略以最大化TBI康复参与度和治疗结果;标识符:NCT03033901。