Suppr超能文献

中度至重度颅脑损伤后住院康复期间睡眠呼吸暂停筛查工具的比较效果。

Comparative Effectiveness of Sleep Apnea Screening Instruments During Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Moderate to Severe TBI.

机构信息

Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences, Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center at James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida; Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.

Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Medicine Service, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Feb;101(2):283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and comparative effectiveness of traditional sleep apnea screening tools in traumatic brain injury (TBI) neurorehabilitation admissions.

DESIGN

Prospective diagnostic comparative effectiveness trial of sleep apnea screening tools relative to the criterion standard, attended level 1 polysomnography including encephalography.

SETTING

Six TBI Model System Inpatient Rehabilitation Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Between May 2017 and February 2019, 449 of 896 screened were eligible for the trial with 345 consented (77% consented). Additional screening left 263 eligible for and completing polysomnography with final analyses completed on 248.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Area under the curve (AUC) of screening tools relative to total apnea hypopnea index≥15 (AHI, moderate to severe apnea) measured at a median of 47 days post-TBI (interquartile range, 29-47).

RESULTS

The Berlin high-risk score (receiving operating curve [ROC] AUC=0.634) was inferior to the Multivariable Apnea Prediction Index (MAPI) (ROC AUC=0.780) (P=.0211; CI, 0.018-0.223) and Snoring, Tired, Observed, Blood Pressure, Body Mass Index, Age, Neck Circumference, and Gender (STOPBANG) score (ROC AUC=0.785) (P=.001; CI, 0.063-0.230), both of which had comparable AUC (P=.7245; CI, -0.047 to 0.068). Findings were similar for AHI≥30 (severe apnea); however, no differences across scales was observed at AHI≥5. The pattern was similar across TBI severity subgroups except for posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) status wherein the MAPI outperformed the Berlin. Youden's index to determine risk yielded lower sensitivities but higher specificities relative to non-TBI samples.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to provide clinicians with data to support a choice for which sleep apnea screening tools are more effective during inpatient rehabilitation for TBI (STOPBANG, MAPI vs Berlin) to help reduce comorbidity and possibly improve neurologic outcome.

摘要

目的

确定传统睡眠呼吸暂停筛查工具在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)神经康复入院中的诊断敏感性和特异性以及比较效果。

设计

睡眠呼吸暂停筛查工具相对于标准的前瞻性诊断比较有效性试验,包括脑电图的 1 级多导睡眠图。

地点

6 个 TBI 模型系统住院康复中心。

参与者

2017 年 5 月至 2019 年 2 月期间,对 896 名筛查对象进行筛查,其中 449 名符合试验条件,345 名同意(77%同意)。进一步的筛查使 263 名符合条件并完成了多导睡眠图检查,最终分析完成于 248 名患者。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

TBI 后中位数 47 天(四分位距,29-47)时,以总呼吸暂停低通气指数≥15(AHI,中度至重度呼吸暂停)为标准的筛查工具的曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

柏林高风险评分(ROC AUC=0.634)低于多变量呼吸暂停预测指数(MAPI)(ROC AUC=0.780)(P=.0211;CI,0.018-0.223)和打鼾、疲劳、观察、血压、体重指数、年龄、颈围和性别(STOPBANG)评分(ROC AUC=0.785)(P=.001;CI,0.063-0.230),两者的 AUC 相当(P=.7245;CI,-0.047 至 0.068)。在 AHI≥30(重度呼吸暂停)时,结果相似;然而,在 AHI≥5 时,各量表之间没有差异。除了创伤后遗忘症(PTA)状态外,这种模式在 TBI 严重程度亚组中是相似的,在 PTA 状态中,MAPI 优于柏林。确定风险的约登指数表明,与非 TBI 样本相比,敏感性降低,但特异性提高。

结论

本研究首次为临床医生提供了数据,以支持在 TBI 住院康复期间使用哪种睡眠呼吸暂停筛查工具更有效(STOPBANG、MAPI 与柏林),以帮助减少合并症并可能改善神经功能预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验