• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的发热相关疾病患者致命不良预后预测:一项回顾性研究。

Prediction of fatal adverse prognosis in patients with fever-related diseases based on machine learning: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.

Department of Emergency, The First Medical Center to Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Mar 5;133(5):583-589. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000675.

DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000675
PMID:32044816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7065855/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fever is the most common chief complaint of emergency patients. Early identification of patients at an increasing risk of death may avert adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish an early prediction model of fatal adverse prognosis of fever patients by extracting key indicators using big data technology.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients' data was conducted using the Emergency Rescue Database of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. Patients were divided into the fatal adverse prognosis group and the good prognosis group. The commonly used clinical indicators were compared. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) method was used to determine the optimal number of the included variables. In the training model, logistic regression, random forest, adaboost and bagging were selected. We also collected the emergency room data from December 2018 to December 2019 with the same inclusion and exclusion criterion. The performance of the model was evaluated by accuracy, F1-score, precision, sensitivity and the areas under receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC).

RESULTS

The accuracy of logistic regression, decision tree, adaboost and bagging was 0.951, 0.928, 0.924, and 0.924, F1-scores were 0.938, 0.933, 0.930, and 0.930, the precision was 0.943, 0.938, 0.937, and 0.937, ROC-AUC were 0.808, 0.738, 0.736, and 0.885, respectively. ROC-AUC of ten-fold cross-validation in logistic and bagging models were 0.80 and 0.87, respectively. The top six coefficients and odds ratio (OR) values of the variables in the Logistic regression were cardiac troponin T (CTnT) (coefficient=0.346, OR = 1.413), temperature (T) (coefficient=0.235, OR = 1.265), respiratory rate (RR) (coefficient= -0.206,OR = 0.814), serum kalium (K) (coefficient=0.137, OR = 1.146), pulse oxygen saturation (SPO2) (coefficient= -0.101, OR = 0.904), and albumin (ALB) (coefficient= -0.043, OR = 0.958). The weights of the top six variables in the bagging model were: CTnT, RR, lactate dehydrogenase, serum amylase, heartrate, and systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The main clinical indicators of concern included CTnT, RR, SPO2, T, ALB and K. The bagging model and logistic regression model had better diagnostic performance comprehesively. Those may be conducive to the early identification of critical patients with fever by physicians.

摘要

背景

发热是急诊患者最常见的主诉。早期识别出死亡风险增加的患者,可能避免不良结局。本研究旨在通过大数据技术提取关键指标,建立发热患者致命不良预后的早期预测模型。

方法

采用中国人民解放军总医院急诊急救数据库进行回顾性研究。患者分为预后不良组和预后良好组。比较常用的临床指标。采用递归特征消除(RFE)方法确定纳入变量的最佳数量。在训练模型中,选择逻辑回归、随机森林、自适应增强和袋装法。我们还收集了 2018 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月的急诊室数据,纳入和排除标准相同。通过准确性、F1 分数、精度、敏感性和接受者操作特征曲线(ROC-AUC)下的面积来评估模型的性能。

结果

逻辑回归、决策树、自适应增强和袋装法的准确性分别为 0.951、0.928、0.924 和 0.924,F1 分数分别为 0.938、0.933、0.930 和 0.930,精度分别为 0.943、0.938、0.937 和 0.937,ROC-AUC 分别为 0.808、0.738、0.736 和 0.885。逻辑回归和袋装模型的十折交叉验证 ROC-AUC 分别为 0.80 和 0.87。逻辑回归中变量的前六个系数和优势比(OR)值为肌钙蛋白 T(CTnT)(系数=0.346,OR=1.413)、温度(T)(系数=0.235,OR=1.265)、呼吸频率(RR)(系数=-0.206,OR=0.814)、血清钾(K)(系数=0.137,OR=1.146)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SPO2)(系数=-0.101,OR=0.904)和白蛋白(ALB)(系数=-0.043,OR=0.958)。袋装模型中前六个变量的权重为:CTnT、RR、乳酸脱氢酶、血清淀粉酶、心率和收缩压。

结论

主要关注的临床指标包括 CTnT、RR、SPO2、T、ALB 和 K。袋装模型和逻辑回归模型的诊断性能综合较好。这些可能有助于医生早期识别发热的危急患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5854/7065855/e6bae6ba2afc/cm9-133-583-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5854/7065855/fafe7c9b5cd5/cm9-133-583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5854/7065855/e6bae6ba2afc/cm9-133-583-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5854/7065855/fafe7c9b5cd5/cm9-133-583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5854/7065855/e6bae6ba2afc/cm9-133-583-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of fatal adverse prognosis in patients with fever-related diseases based on machine learning: A retrospective study.基于机器学习的发热相关疾病患者致命不良预后预测:一项回顾性研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Mar 5;133(5):583-589. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000675.
2
[Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis of dengue fever incidence in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province in 2023].[2023年云南省西双版纳登革热发病的临床特征及危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Sep;36(9):917-923. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240412-00339.
3
[The predictive value of medical big data for the prognosis of elderly patients with pneumonia: based on the result of clinical database of a Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Consortium Chaoyang Emergency Ward].[医学大数据对老年肺炎患者预后的预测价值:基于北京朝阳医院医联体朝阳急诊病房临床数据库结果]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):338-343. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200611-00461.
4
A Machine Learning-Based Model to Predict Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy in Trauma Patients Upon Emergency Hospitalization.基于机器学习的模型预测创伤患者急诊住院时的急性创伤性凝血病。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029619897827. doi: 10.1177/1076029619897827.
5
Machine learning approach for predicting cardiovascular disease in Bangladesh: evidence from a cross-sectional study in 2023.机器学习方法预测孟加拉国的心血管疾病:2023 年横断面研究的证据。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03883-2.
6
Predicting the hearing outcome in sudden sensorineural hearing loss via machine learning models.基于机器学习模型预测突发性聋的听力预后。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Jun;43(3):868-874. doi: 10.1111/coa.13068. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
7
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
[Comparison of machine learning method and logistic regression model in prediction of acute kidney injury in severely burned patients].[机器学习方法与逻辑回归模型在预测重度烧伤患者急性肾损伤中的比较]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 20;34(6):343-348. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.006.
9
[Combined predictive value of the risk factors influencing the short-term prognosis of sepsis].[影响脓毒症短期预后的危险因素的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):307-312. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200306-00218.
10
Performance of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in critically ill patients for the prediction of maternal death.产科早期预警评分在危重症患者中预测孕产妇死亡的效能
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):58.e1-58.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.103. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Intelligent assistant diagnosis for pediatric inguinal hernia based on a multilayer and unbalanced classification model.基于多层非平衡分类模型的小儿腹股沟疝智能辅助诊断
Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1105891. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1105891. eCollection 2023.