• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独居与非独居急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者长期死亡率比较。

Comparison of long-term mortality between living alone patients vs. living together patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, 1129 Nagaoka, Izunokuni, Shizuoka 410-2295, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;6(4):332-337. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa011.

DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa011
PMID:32044997
Abstract

AIMS

Living alone is reported as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about the association between clinical outcomes and living alone in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to determine whether living alone is an independent prognostic risk factor for long-term mortality stratified by age in patients with ACS who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted an observational cohort study of ACS patients who underwent PCI between January 1999 and May 2015 at Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Japan. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Among 2547 ACS patients, 381 (15.0%) patients were living alone at the onset of ACS. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was comparable between living alone and living together (34.8% vs. 34.4%, log-rank P = 0.63). However, among younger population (aged <65 years), the incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in the living alone group (log-rank P = 0.01). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed a significant association between living alone and all-cause death, even after adjusting for other risk factors (hazard ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.38-3.84, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although living alone was not significantly associated with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ACS, it was a predictive risk factor among younger ACS patients. Careful attention should be paid to patients' lifestyle, especially younger patients with ACS.

摘要

目的

独居被报道为心血管疾病的独立危险因素。然而,对于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的临床结局与独居之间的关系知之甚少。本研究旨在确定在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ACS 患者中,独居是否是与年龄分层的长期死亡率相关的独立预后危险因素。

方法和结果

我们对日本顺天堂大学静冈医院在 1999 年 1 月至 2015 年 5 月期间接受 PCI 的 ACS 患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。主要终点是全因死亡。在 2547 例 ACS 患者中,381 例(15.0%)患者在 ACS 发病时独居。独居和同住患者的全因死亡累积发生率相当(34.8% vs. 34.4%,log-rank P=0.63)。然而,在年轻人群(<65 岁)中,独居组的全因死亡率明显更高(log-rank P=0.01)。多变量 Cox 风险分析显示,独居与全因死亡之间存在显著关联,即使在调整其他危险因素后也是如此(风险比 2.30,95%置信区间 1.38-3.84,P=0.001)。

结论

尽管独居与 ACS 患者的长期临床结局无显著相关性,但它是年轻 ACS 患者的预测危险因素。应仔细关注患者的生活方式,特别是年轻的 ACS 患者。

相似文献

1
Comparison of long-term mortality between living alone patients vs. living together patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.独居与非独居急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者长期死亡率比较。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;6(4):332-337. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa011.
2
Comparison of long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention in patients living alone versus not living alone at the time of hospitalization.比较住院时独居与非独居的急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的长期死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
3
Prognostic usefulness of residual SYNTAX score combined with clinical factors for patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from the SHINANO Registry.SYNTAX 评分残余值联合临床因素对急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的预后预测价值:来自 SHINANO 注册研究。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Feb;36(2):170-179. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01680-3. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
Does the subtype of acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention predict long-term clinical outcomes?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征亚型是否预测长期临床结局?
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Oct 1;4(4):318-327. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy009.
5
[Age-related differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome under the chest pain center model: a multicenter retrospective study].胸痛中心模式下急性冠状动脉综合征管理与结局的年龄相关差异:一项多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):318-323. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200806-00565.
6
Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in non-dialysis patients with acute coronary syndrome and advanced renal dysfunction.急性冠状动脉综合征合并严重肾功能不全的非透析患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床转归。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020 Apr;24(4):339-348. doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01839-x. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Clinical impact of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein during follow-up on long-term adverse clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者随访期间高敏 C 反应蛋白对长期不良临床结局的临床影响。
J Cardiol. 2019 Jan;73(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Prognostic Impact of Subsequent Acute Coronary Syndrome and Unplanned Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After an Index Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From a Japanese Multicenter Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后后续急性冠状动脉综合征和计划性血运重建对长期死亡率的预后影响:来自日本多中心注册研究的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 27;6(11):e006529. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006529.
9
Impacts of intensive follow-up on the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients - a single center prospective randomized controlled study in a Chinese population.强化随访对急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗长期预后的影响——一项中国人群单中心前瞻性随机对照研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(10):1077-85. doi: 10.1177/2047487315607041. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
10
Acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians: association between percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality.八旬老人的急性冠状动脉综合征:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与长期死亡率之间的关联。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Sep 28;10:1547-53. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S89127. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparisons of Patients Living Alone versus Living with Others in Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中独居患者与与他人同住患者的比较。
Int J Angiol. 2023 Apr 12;32(3):179-187. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767697. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in High-Risk Myocardial Infarction Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基于直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测规则的制定与验证。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Jul 18;17:1099-1111. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S358761. eCollection 2022.