• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享注视无法改善团队视觉监测。

Shared Gaze Fails to Improve Team Visual Monitoring.

作者信息

McCarley Jason S, Leggett Nathan, Enright Alison

机构信息

2694 Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA.

1065 Flinders University, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2021 Jun;63(4):696-705. doi: 10.1177/0018720820902347. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1177/0018720820902347
PMID:32045281
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to test the value of shared gaze as a way to improve team performance in a visual monitoring task.

BACKGROUND

Teams outperform individuals in monitoring tasks, but fall short of achievable levels. Shared-gaze displays offer a potential method of improving team efficiency. Within a shared-gaze arrangement, operators collaborate on a visual task, and each team member's display includes a cursor to represent the other teammates' point of regard. Past work has suggested that shared gaze allows operators to better communicate and coordinate their attentional scanning in a visual search task. The current experiments sought to replicate and extend earlier findings of inefficient team performance in a visual monitoring task, and asked whether shared gaze would improve team efficiency.

METHOD

Participants performed a visual monitoring task framed as a sonar operation. Displays were matrices of luminance patches varying in intensity. The participants' task was to monitor for occasional critical signals, patches of high luminance. In Experiment 1, pairs of participants performed the task independently, or working as teams. In Experiment 2, teams of two participants performed the task with or without shared-gaze displays.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, teams detected more critical signals than individuals, but were statistically inefficient; detection rates were lower than predicted by a control model that assumed pairs of operators searching in isolation. In Experiment 2, shared gaze failed to increase target detection rates.

CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION

Operators collaborate inefficiently in visual monitoring tasks, and shared gaze does not improve their performance.

摘要

目的

测试共享注视作为一种提高视觉监测任务中团队绩效的方法的价值。

背景

在监测任务中,团队的表现优于个体,但未达到可实现的水平。共享注视显示器提供了一种提高团队效率的潜在方法。在共享注视安排中,操作员协作完成视觉任务,每个团队成员的显示器上都有一个光标来代表其他队友的注视点。过去的研究表明,共享注视能让操作员在视觉搜索任务中更好地沟通和协调他们的注意力扫描。当前的实验试图复制并扩展早期关于视觉监测任务中团队绩效低下的研究结果,并探讨共享注视是否能提高团队效率。

方法

参与者执行一项被设定为声纳操作的视觉监测任务。显示器是由强度不同的亮度斑块组成的矩阵。参与者的任务是监测偶尔出现的关键信号,即高亮度斑块。在实验1中,参与者成对独立执行任务,或作为团队执行任务。在实验2中,两名参与者组成的团队在有或没有共享注视显示器的情况下执行任务。

结果

在实验1中,团队比个体检测到更多的关键信号,但在统计学上效率低下;检测率低于假设操作员成对单独搜索的控制模型所预测的水平。在实验2中,共享注视未能提高目标检测率。

结论与应用

操作员在视觉监测任务中的协作效率低下,共享注视并不能提高他们的表现。

相似文献

1
Shared Gaze Fails to Improve Team Visual Monitoring.共享注视无法改善团队视觉监测。
Hum Factors. 2021 Jun;63(4):696-705. doi: 10.1177/0018720820902347. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.协调认知:协作搜索过程中共享注视的成本与收益
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1465-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
3
Gaze Sharing, a Double-Edged Sword: Examining the Effect of Real-Time Gaze Sharing Visualizations on Team Performance and Situation Awareness.目光共享:一把双刃剑——探究实时目光共享可视化对团队绩效和态势感知的影响
Hum Factors. 2025 Mar;67(3):196-224. doi: 10.1177/00187208241272060. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.记录用于神经科学研究和实时功能性皮层图谱绘制的人类皮层脑电图(ECoG)信号。
J Vis Exp. 2012 Jun 26(64):3993. doi: 10.3791/3993.
5
Just look away: Gaze aversions as an overt attentional disengagement mechanism.只需转移视线:目光回避作为一种明显的注意力脱离机制。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
6
Effects of Depth Information on Visual Target Identification Task Performance in Shared Gaze Environments.深度信息对共享注视环境下视觉目标识别任务表现的影响。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 May;26(5):1934-1944. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973054. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
High target prevalence may reduce the spread of attention during search tasks.高目标出现率可能会减少搜索任务中注意力的分散。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):62-83. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02821-2. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Joint attention is intact even when visuospatial working memory is occupied.即使视觉空间工作记忆被占用,联合注意仍保持完好。
Vision Res. 2019 Jan;154:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students' self-monitoring and learning in radiology.注视-显示反馈对医学生放射医学自我监测和学习的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Nov;29(5):1689-1710. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
10
Relations between Eye Movement, Postural Sway and Cognitive Involvement in Unprecise and Precise Visual Tasks.眼动、姿势摆动与不精确和精确视觉任务认知投入之间的关系。
Neuroscience. 2019 Sep 15;416:177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.031. Epub 2019 Jul 26.