Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Center for Health Services Research, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt Center for Kidney Disease, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2020 Aug;23(8):1045-1051. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0570. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Goals of care (GOC) conversations are critical to advance care planning but occur infrequently in nephrology. National workshops have improved trainee comfort with initiating GOC conversations but lack interface with palliative subspecialists and can incur travel-related costs. We developed an educational intervention focused on GOC conversations for nephrology trainees that incorporated into routine schedules and offered feedback from palliative subspecialists. To explore barriers and facilitators to discussing GOC and uncover perceptions of GOC-related behavior change post-intervention. Qualitative study. Sixteen nephrology trainees at an academic medical center. Analyses of semistructured interviews occurred in phases: (1) isolation of quotes; (2) development of a coding system; and (3) creation of a framework of interrelationships between quotes using an inductive/deductive approach. We captured the following themes: (1) prior knowledge (ability to define GOC, knowledge of communication frameworks and prognostic data, exposure to outpatient GOC conversations; (2) attitudes related to GOC conversations (responsibility, comfort, therapeutic alliance, patient preparedness, partnership with care teams); and (3) potential change in behaviors (increased likelihood to initiate GOC conversations early, more accurate identification of patients appropriate for a GOC conversation). Prior knowledge of, exposure to, and attitudes toward advance care planning were key determinants of a nephrology trainees' ability to initiate timely GOC conversations. After our intervention, trainees reported increased comfort with and likelihood to initiate GOC conversations and an improved ability to identify appropriate candidates. Our intervention may be a novel, feasible way to coach nephrologists to initiate timely GOC conversations.
目标关怀(GOC)对话对于推进预先护理计划至关重要,但在肾脏病学中很少发生。国家研讨会提高了学员在发起 GOC 对话方面的舒适度,但缺乏与姑息治疗专家的接口,并且可能会产生相关旅行费用。我们开发了一种针对肾脏病学学员的 GOC 对话教育干预措施,该措施纳入了常规日程,并提供了姑息治疗专家的反馈。为了探讨讨论 GOC 的障碍和促进因素,并揭示干预后与 GOC 相关的行为变化的看法。 定性研究。 一家学术医疗中心的 16 名肾脏病学学员。 对半结构化访谈进行了分析,分三个阶段进行:(1)摘录的隔离;(2)编码系统的开发;(3)使用归纳/演绎方法创建摘录之间相互关系的框架。 我们捕捉到以下主题:(1)先前的知识(定义 GOC 的能力,对沟通框架和预后数据的了解,对门诊 GOC 对话的了解);(2)与 GOC 对话相关的态度(责任,舒适,治疗联盟,患者准备情况,与护理团队的伙伴关系);(3)行为变化的潜力(更有可能及早发起 GOC 对话,更准确地确定适合 GOC 对话的患者)。 预先了解,接触和对预先护理计划的态度是肾脏病学学员及时发起 GOC 对话的能力的关键决定因素。在我们的干预之后,学员报告说他们对发起 GOC 对话的舒适度和可能性有所提高,并且能够更好地识别合适的候选人。我们的干预措施可能是一种新颖,可行的方法,可以指导肾脏病医师及时发起 GOC 对话。