Seidl Helena, Nilsson Thomas, Hofvander Björn, Billstedt Eva, Wallinius Märta
Region Sormland, Katrineholm, Sweden.
Centre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 28;11:58. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00058. eCollection 2020.
Previous research has suggested that personality and cognitive functions are essential in the emergence of persistent aggressive antisocial behaviors and that character maturity could be an important protective factor against these behaviors. The aims of this study were (1) to determine associations between personality traits, intellectual ability, and executive function in young male violent offenders, and (2) to investigate differences in intellectual ability and executive function between groups of violent offenders with low, medium, and high character maturity. A cohort of 148 male violent offenders (18-25 years of age) participated in this study. The Temperament and Character Inventory was used as a self-report measure of personality traits, and cognitive functions were measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition and the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Intellectual ability was negatively correlated to the temperament dimension Harm Avoidance and the character dimension Self-Transcendence, and positively correlated to the character dimensions Self-Directedness and Cooperativeness and the temperament dimension Novelty Seeking. Visual sustained attention correlated positively to the temperament dimension Persistence and negatively to the temperament dimension Harm Avoidance. Spatial working memory correlated negatively to the character dimension Cooperativeness. Character maturity, however, did not affect intellectual and executive functions to a statistically significant degree. Our findings indicate that offender personality characteristics such as optimism, responsibility, empathy, curiosity, and industry that would seem more favorable to positive intervention outcomes are related to better cognitive functioning. Possible implications are that interventions in offender populations could be more effective if tailored to participants' personality dimensions and cognitive proficiencies, rather than offered as "one size fits all."
先前的研究表明,人格和认知功能在持续性攻击型反社会行为的出现中至关重要,并且性格成熟度可能是抵御这些行为的一个重要保护因素。本研究的目的是:(1)确定年轻男性暴力罪犯的人格特质、智力能力和执行功能之间的关联;(2)调查性格成熟度低、中、高的暴力罪犯群体在智力能力和执行功能方面的差异。148名年龄在18至25岁之间的男性暴力罪犯参与了本研究。气质与性格问卷被用作人格特质的自我报告测量工具,认知功能则通过韦氏成人智力量表第三版和剑桥神经心理测试自动成套测验进行测量。智力能力与气质维度中的回避伤害以及性格维度中的自我超越呈负相关,与性格维度中的自我导向、合作性以及气质维度中的寻求新奇呈正相关。视觉持续注意力与气质维度中的坚持性呈正相关,与气质维度中的回避伤害呈负相关。空间工作记忆与性格维度中的合作性呈负相关。然而,性格成熟度对智力和执行功能的影响在统计学上并不显著。我们的研究结果表明,诸如乐观、责任、同理心、好奇心和勤奋等似乎更有利于积极干预结果的罪犯人格特征与更好的认知功能相关。可能的影响是,如果针对参与者的人格维度和认知能力进行量身定制,而不是采用“一刀切”的方式,那么对罪犯群体的干预可能会更有效。