Suppr超能文献

暴力与非暴力罪犯人格特征的比较研究:一项横断面研究。

A comparative study of personality profile among violent and non-violent convicts: A cross sectional study.

作者信息

Singh Paramjeet, Daderwal Mukesh Chand, Faizan Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;64(6):595-598. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_610_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

Abstract

The conviction-prone personality sees events as external forces and not according to their own or another's emotion, cognition, or inner forces. This study compared the personality traits and psychopathology of both violent and non-violent convicts. The total number of samples were 60 (30 violent and 30 non-violent) which were recruited from the Central jail of Jaipur (Rajasthan). A pro forma was used to collect sociodemographic variables. The 16-personality factor questionnaire was applied after receiving permission from the concerned authorities. Student t-test was applied to compare violent and non-violent convicts. Violent convicts had high scores for factors E (dominance), H (social boldness), L (vigilance), Q2 (social reliance), and Q4 (tension) and low scores for C (emotional stability) and G (rule consciousness). Whereas non-violent convicts had high scores for factors L (vigilance) and N (privateness) and low score for A (warmth), F (liveliness), O (apprehension), Q2 (self-reliance), and Q4 (tension). All results are statistically significant (-value was 0.001), except factor I (-value was 0.745) and M (-value was 0.314). So, the violent convict group were significantly more dominant, bossy, competitive, bold, self-reliant, individualistic, tense, frustrated, high-energy driven, and self-indulgent as compare to non-violent convicts.

摘要

易定罪人格将事件视为外部力量,而非依据自身或他人的情感、认知或内在力量。本研究比较了暴力罪犯和非暴力罪犯的人格特质与精神病理学情况。样本总数为60人(30名暴力罪犯和30名非暴力罪犯),均从斋浦尔(拉贾斯坦邦)中央监狱招募。使用一份表格收集社会人口统计学变量。在获得相关当局许可后,应用了16种人格因素问卷。采用学生t检验来比较暴力罪犯和非暴力罪犯。暴力罪犯在因素E(支配性)、H(社交大胆性)、L(警惕性)、Q2(社会依赖性)和Q4(紧张性)上得分较高,而在C(情绪稳定性)和G(规则意识)上得分较低。而非暴力罪犯在因素L(警惕性)和N(隐私性)上得分较高,在A(热情)、F(活泼性)、O(忧虑性)、Q2(自我依赖性)和Q4(紧张性)上得分较低。除因素I(p值为0.745)和M(p值为0.314)外,所有结果均具有统计学意义(p值为0.001)。因此,与非暴力罪犯相比,暴力罪犯群体在支配性、专横、竞争性、大胆、自我依赖、个人主义、紧张、沮丧、高能量驱动和自我放纵方面表现得更为显著。

相似文献

1
4
Psychological factors are closely associated with the Bell's palsy: a case-control study.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2012 Apr;32(2):272-279. doi: 10.1007/s11596-012-0048-0. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
10
The role of aggression in substance use: The prison case.攻击行为在物质使用中的作用:监狱案例。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2025 Jul-Sep;24(3):770-784. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2023.2268564. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Personality disorders and violence: what is the link?人格障碍与暴力:二者有何关联?
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015 Sep 17;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0033-x. eCollection 2015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验