• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变革时期提供服务:员工能否通过工作重塑干预维持其授权感、工作投入度和服务质量水平?

Providing Services During Times of Change: Can Employees Maintain Their Levels of Empowerment, Work Engagement and Service Quality Through a Job Crafting Intervention?

作者信息

Hulshof Inge L, Demerouti Evangelia, Le Blanc Pascale M

机构信息

Human Performance Management Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 28;11:87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00087. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00087
PMID:32047468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6997430/
Abstract

By means of a quasi-experimental study, the effects of a tailor-made job crafting intervention for employees of a Dutch unemployment agency were evaluated. The intervention was designed to prevent a decrease in employee empowerment, work engagement and employee performance (i.e., the provision of services) due to organizational changes. Seventy-four employees received a 1-day training in which they set four job crafting goals for the subsequent weeks. After 6 weeks a reflection session was organized. Repeated measures ANOVA's showed that the intervention prevented a decrease in employees' feelings of empowerment. Furthermore, pre-post comparison tests showed that the control group ( = 89) experienced a significant decrease in work engagement, whereas the intervention group did not. Results showed no effect on customer-rated employee service quality. However, 1 year after the intervention, customer ratings of employee service quality were significantly higher for the intervention group compared to the control group. Although further research is needed, our results demonstrate that a job crafting intervention may be a promising tool to combat a decline in employee empowerment and work engagement during times of organizational change.

摘要

通过一项准实验研究,评估了为荷兰一家失业机构员工量身定制的工作重塑干预措施的效果。该干预措施旨在防止因组织变革导致员工赋权、工作投入和员工绩效(即服务提供)下降。74名员工接受了为期1天的培训,在培训中他们为接下来的几周设定了四个工作重塑目标。6周后组织了一次反思会议。重复测量方差分析表明,该干预措施防止了员工赋权感的下降。此外,前后比较测试表明,对照组(n = 89)的工作投入显著下降,而干预组没有。结果显示对客户评价的员工服务质量没有影响。然而,在干预1年后,与对照组相比,干预组的客户对员工服务质量的评价显著更高。尽管还需要进一步研究,但我们的结果表明,工作重塑干预可能是应对组织变革期间员工赋权和工作投入下降的一种有前景的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/221f9bd9f5b6/fpsyg-11-00087-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/13b0a05b187c/fpsyg-11-00087-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/6073a6f155ed/fpsyg-11-00087-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/221f9bd9f5b6/fpsyg-11-00087-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/13b0a05b187c/fpsyg-11-00087-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/6073a6f155ed/fpsyg-11-00087-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a8b/6997430/221f9bd9f5b6/fpsyg-11-00087-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Providing Services During Times of Change: Can Employees Maintain Their Levels of Empowerment, Work Engagement and Service Quality Through a Job Crafting Intervention?变革时期提供服务:员工能否通过工作重塑干预维持其授权感、工作投入度和服务质量水平?
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 28;11:87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00087. eCollection 2020.
2
Interactions of Approach and Avoidance Job Crafting and Work Engagement: A Comparison between Employees Affected and Not Affected by Organizational Changes.趋近回避工作重塑与工作投入的相互作用:组织变革影响与未影响员工的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 5;17(23):9084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239084.
3
Job Autonomy and Work Meaning: Drivers of Employee Job-Crafting Behaviors in the VUCA Times.工作自主性与工作意义:易变、不确定、复杂和模糊时代员工工作重塑行为的驱动因素
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;13(6):493. doi: 10.3390/bs13060493.
4
Do Organizational Health Climates and Leader Health Mindsets Enhance Employees' Work Engagement and Job Crafting Amid the Pandemic?组织健康氛围和领导者健康心态能否在大流行期间增强员工的工作投入和工作重塑?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212123.
5
Linking job crafting, innovation performance, and career satisfaction: The mediating role of work engagement.链接工作塑造、创新绩效和职业满意度:工作投入的中介作用。
Work. 2023;75(3):877-886. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211363.
6
Leader Humor and Employee Job Crafting: The Role of Employee-Perceived Organizational Support and Work Engagement.领导者幽默与员工工作重塑:员工感知到的组织支持和工作投入的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:499849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.499849. eCollection 2020.
7
Job crafting, work engagement, and psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study.日本员工的工作重塑、工作投入与心理困扰:一项横断面研究。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2017 Feb 10;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13030-017-0091-y. eCollection 2017.
8
Employees' Perceived Opportunities to Craft and In-Role Performance: The Mediating Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement.员工感知到的塑造机会与角色内绩效:工作塑造与工作投入的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 25;8:1876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01876. eCollection 2017.
9
Effects of a job crafting intervention program on work engagement among Japanese employees: a pretest-posttest study.工作重塑干预方案对日本员工工作投入的影响:一项前后测研究。
BMC Psychol. 2016 Oct 24;4(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0157-9.
10
Effects of a Job Crafting Intervention Program on Work Engagement Among Japanese Employees: A Randomized Controlled Trial.工作重塑干预计划对日本员工工作投入的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;11:235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00235. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Foster Mental Health and Reintegration in Individuals Who Are Unemployed: Systematic Review.促进失业者心理健康与重新融入社会的干预措施:系统评价
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 May 5;11:e65698. doi: 10.2196/65698.
2
Effect of Job Crafting Intervention Program on Harmonious Work Passion and Career Commitment among Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial.工作重塑干预计划对护士和谐工作热情和职业承诺的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Jul 13;2023:9623866. doi: 10.1155/2023/9623866. eCollection 2023.
3
The influence of psychosocial work environment, personal perceived health and job crafting on nurses' well-being: a cross-sectional survey study.

本文引用的文献

1
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
2
Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review.组织中心理和团队授权的前因和后果:元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):981-1003. doi: 10.1037/a0022676.
3
Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test.
社会心理工作环境、个人感知健康和工作重塑对护士幸福感的影响:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 3;23(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02041-5.
4
Feeling good and doing more: How does the customer respond to pro-customer deviance in the context of hospitality.感觉良好并做得更多:在酒店服务业背景下,顾客如何应对有利于顾客的违规行为。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:1025210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025210. eCollection 2022.
5
Autonomy-supportive agents: whose support matters most, and how does it unfold in the workplace?自主性支持型主体:谁的支持最为重要,以及它在工作场所如何体现?
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jul 30:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03550-9.
6
Grand Challenges for Positive Psychology: Future Perspectives and Opportunities.积极心理学的重大挑战:未来展望与机遇
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:833057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833057. eCollection 2022.
7
PERMA+4: A Framework for Work-Related Wellbeing, Performance and Positive Organizational Psychology 2.0.PERMA+4:工作相关幸福感、绩效与积极组织心理学2.0的框架
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:817244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817244. eCollection 2021.
将工作要求和资源与员工敬业度和倦怠联系起来:理论扩展和元分析检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):834-48. doi: 10.1037/a0019364.
4
Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review.健康促进与健康行为干预中的定期提示与提醒:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2009 May 14;11(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1138.
5
Patient-centered goal setting as a tool to improve diabetes self-management.以患者为中心的目标设定作为改善糖尿病自我管理的一种工具。
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jun;33 Suppl 6:139S-144S. doi: 10.1177/0145721707304475.
6
A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams.团队中领导力、赋权与绩效的多层次研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):331-46. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331.
7
New systems of work organization and workers' health.工作组织新体系与工人健康。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):421-30. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1048.
8
Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: a cross-level study.理解组织变革、个体差异与人-环境匹配变化之间的关系:一项跨层次研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Oct;89(5):868-82. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.868.
9
The sustainability of health promotion interventions for different levels of social organization.针对不同社会组织层面的健康促进干预措施的可持续性。
Health Promot Int. 2004 Mar;19(1):123-30. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah113.
10
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.