Suppr超能文献

人精子无保护剂玻璃化冷冻的无菌技术:直接滴入清洁的液态空气中的凋亡、坏死、活力和生存力。

Aseptic Technology for Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Human Spermatozoa by Direct Dropping into Clean Liquid Air: Apoptosis, Necrosis, Motility, and Viability.

机构信息

Research Group for Reproductive Medicine and IVF-Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Genecology, Cologne University, Kerpener Str. 34, 50931 Cologne, Germany.

Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Tzarigradsko Shosse 73, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 24;2020:2934315. doi: 10.1155/2020/2934315. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the quality of human spermatozoa vitrified by direct plunging into liquid nitrogen vs. liquid air. Spermatozoa were divided into three groups: fresh spermatozoa (Group F) were used as a control. Spermatozoa suspension (20 l) was vitrified in open granules by direct dropping into liquid nitrogen (Group LN) or clean liquid air (Group LA). After warming at 37°C, the progressive motility rate of Group F was reduced from 65.9 ± 2.5% to 34.0 ± 1.9% (Group LN) and 38.1 ± 2.3% (Group LA), respectively (P < 0.05). The reductions in viability were 65.6 ± 2.2%, 29.0 ± 1.8%, and 36.6 ± 2.6% for Groups F, LN, and LA, respectively (P < 0.05). Comparing spermatozoa vitrified in liquid nitrogen vs. liquid air, no significant differences were detected in motility (34.0 ± 1.9% vs. 38.1 ± 2.3%), viability (29.0 ± 1.8% vs. 36.6 ± 2.6%), early apoptosis (13.8 ± 1.5% vs. 14.3 ± 1.8%), late apoptosis (45.5 ± 1.8% vs. 43.7 ± 2.2%), and necrosis (19.5 ± 2.0% vs. 15.0 ± 1.8%; > 0.01 for all respective differences). There was a statistical tendency for increasing rates of "progressive motility" and "viability" and decreasing rates of "apoptosis" and "necrosis" when comparing spermatozoa vitrified in liquid air vs. liquid nitrogen. It is concluded that cryoprotectant-free vitrification by the direct dropping of human spermatozoa in a clean cooling agent (liquid air) is a good alternative to the use of nonsterile liquid nitrogen and can be used to cool cells while minimising the risk of microbial contamination.

摘要

本研究旨在比较直接浸入液氮与清洁液态空气中的人类精子的冷冻质量。精子分为三组:新鲜精子(组 F)作为对照。精子悬液(20μl)在开放颗粒中直接滴入液氮(组 LN)或清洁液态空气中(组 LA)进行玻璃化冷冻。在 37°C 下解冻后,组 F 的前向运动率分别降低至 34.0±1.9%(组 LN)和 38.1±1.9%(组 LA)(P<0.05)。活力的降低分别为 65.6±1.2%、29.0±1.8%和 36.6±1.8%,分别为组 F、LN 和 LA(P<0.05)。比较在液氮和液态空气中冷冻的精子,运动率(34.0±1.9% vs. 38.1±1.9%)、活力(29.0±1.8% vs. 36.6±1.8%)、早期凋亡(13.8±1.5% vs. 14.3±1.8%)、晚期凋亡(45.5±1.8% vs. 43.7±1.8%)和坏死(19.5±2.0% vs. 15.0±1.8%)无显著差异(所有差异均>0.01)。与在液氮中冷冻的精子相比,在液态空气中冷冻的精子具有更高的“前向运动”和“活力”率以及更低的“凋亡”和“坏死”率的统计趋势。结论:在清洁冷却剂(液态空气)中直接滴注人类精子的无保护剂玻璃化冷冻是使用非无菌液氮的良好替代方法,可用于冷却细胞,同时将微生物污染的风险降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ad6/7003260/ff71a8a68bc8/BMRI2020-2934315.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验