Suppr超能文献

[急性护理医院中痴呆患者使用镇静药物和身体约束:一项非随机病例对照研究]

[Use of sedating medication and physical restraints for patients with dementia in acute care hospitals : A non-randomized case control study].

作者信息

Lüdecke Daniel, Kofahl Christopher

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Mar;53(2):138-144. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01697-3. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of acute care hospitals are not prepared for people with dementia with acute diseases in need of treatment. This results in an increased likelihood of the personnel being overtaxed. Dementia is the most frequent reason that hospital personnel administer sedating medication and use restraining measures.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate factors that influence the (inappropriate) use of sedating medication and physical restraints for patients with dementia in acute care hospitals.

METHODS

A non-randomized case control study, including two internal medicine wards was conducted in Hamburg, Germany. In the intervention group a special care concept was implemented focussing on patients with dementia, while the control group received regular care without a special dementia care concept. Logistic regression models were conducted to investigate associations between factors, such as age, severity of dementia, conspicuous behavior, Barthel index and type of treatment and the use of sedating medication and physical restraint measures.

RESULTS

Challenging behavior (odds ratio, OR = 1.32) and treatment in the control group (OR=1.94) were significantly associated with the use of sedating medication. A low Barthel index, longer periods of hospitalization and treatment in the control group were significantly associated with a higher probability of the implementation of physical restraining measures.

DISCUSSION

The use of sedating medication as well as physical restraining measures varied greatly between the intervention and control groups. This is in line with other studies that came to similar results and suggests that multiple components of special care concepts can explain these differences. These include architectonic design and spatial aspects as well as dementia-specific training of employees and an appropriate personnel complement. Such interventions can also reduce agitation and behavioral problems of patients. The avoidance of sedation and restraining measures is also positively associated with an increase in the quality of life of patients with dementia.

摘要

背景

大多数急症医院没有为患有需要治疗的急性疾病的痴呆症患者做好准备。这导致工作人员负担过重的可能性增加。痴呆症是医院工作人员使用镇静药物和采取约束措施的最常见原因。

目的

本研究的目的是调查影响急症医院痴呆症患者(不适当)使用镇静药物和身体约束措施的因素。

方法

在德国汉堡进行了一项非随机病例对照研究,包括两个内科病房。干预组实施了一项针对痴呆症患者的特殊护理概念,而对照组接受常规护理,没有特殊的痴呆症护理概念。采用逻辑回归模型研究年龄、痴呆严重程度、明显行为、Barthel指数和治疗类型等因素与镇静药物使用和身体约束措施之间的关联。

结果

具有挑战性的行为(比值比,OR = 1.32)和对照组的治疗(OR = 1.94)与镇静药物的使用显著相关。Barthel指数低、住院时间长以及对照组的治疗与实施身体约束措施的较高概率显著相关。

讨论

干预组和对照组在镇静药物的使用以及身体约束措施方面存在很大差异。这与其他得出类似结果的研究一致,表明特殊护理概念的多个组成部分可以解释这些差异。这些包括建筑设计和空间方面,以及员工的痴呆症特定培训和适当的人员配备。此类干预措施还可以减少患者的躁动和行为问题。避免使用镇静和约束措施也与痴呆症患者生活质量的提高呈正相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcb5/8279997/2ae70b89c9b6/391_2020_1697_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验