Radke Phillip M, Rubinstein Tal J, Repp Daniel J, Sires Bryan S
Allure Laser Center & Medispa , Kirkland, Washington, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA.
Orbit. 2021 Feb;40(1):24-29. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1725064. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
: To directly compare an algorithmic external levator resection technique with the choice of intraoperative adjustment to the same technique without intraoperative adjustments. : A sequential controlled prospective comparative cohort study. Two cohorts were compared: a historical control adjustment, and an experimental non-adjustment group. Fourteen patients, 25 eyelids, were in the historical cohort; and 15 patients, 23 eyelids, were in the non-adjustment cohort. Primary acquired ptosis patients who met inclusion criteria were considered. All patients underwent a standardized external levator resection technique. Intraoperative adjustments were performed only in the historical cohort. Age, follow-up time, surgical time, and marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was < 0.05. Primary and secondary outcome measures were postoperative MRD1 minus goal MRD1, and surgical time, respectively. : Twenty-five historical eyelids were compared with 23 non-adjusted eyelids. The average patient age was 68.4 years (range 19-84) and 59.3 years (range 24-83) for the adjusted and non-adjusted groups. Six-month postoperative (postoperative minus goal) MRD1 was -0.1 mm (95% CI -0.3-0.1) and -0.2 mm (95% -0.5-0.0) ( = 0.33), and surgical time was 13.8 min (95% CI 12.6-15.1) and 9.5 min (95% CI 9.0-10.1) ( < 0.001) for the adjusted and non-adjusted cohort, respectively. : The external levator resection, utilizing a standardized algorithm approach, is an efficacious technique for involutional eyelid ptosis. With sound technique, this method can be performed without the need for intraoperative adjustment, thereby saving operative time and achieving similar results.
将一种算法化的外直肌提上睑肌切除术技术与术中不进行调整的相同技术的术中调整选择进行直接比较。:一项序贯对照前瞻性比较队列研究。比较了两个队列:一个历史对照调整组和一个实验性非调整组。历史队列中有14例患者,25只眼睑;非调整队列中有15例患者,23只眼睑。纳入符合纳入标准的原发性后天性上睑下垂患者。所有患者均接受标准化的外直肌提上睑肌切除术技术。仅在历史队列中进行术中调整。收集年龄、随访时间、手术时间和边缘反射距离1(MRD1)。使用曼-惠特尼U检验进行统计分析。统计学显著性为<0.05。主要和次要结局指标分别为术后MRD1减去目标MRD1和手术时间。:将25只历史眼睑与23只未调整眼睑进行比较。调整组和非调整组的平均患者年龄分别为68.4岁(范围19 - 84岁)和59.3岁(范围24 - 83岁)。调整组和非调整组术后6个月(术后减去目标)的MRD1分别为-0.1毫米(95%CI -0.3 - 0.1)和-0.2毫米(95% -0.5 - 0.0)(P = 0.33),手术时间分别为13.8分钟(95%CI 12.6 - 15.1)和9.5分钟(95%CI 9.0 - 10.1)(P < 0.001)。:采用标准化算法方法的外直肌提上睑肌切除术是一种治疗退行性眼睑下垂的有效技术。凭借良好的技术,该方法无需术中调整即可进行,从而节省手术时间并取得相似的效果。