Suppr超能文献

腹膜透析中超滤边缘因素的临床相关性。

Clinical relevance of marginal factors on ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis.

机构信息

Servicio de Nefrología, 16238Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2021 Jan;41(1):86-95. doi: 10.1177/0896860820904556. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) is mainly driven by the osmotic gradient and peritoneal permeability, but other factors-such as intraperitoneal pressure (IPP)-also have an influence.

METHODS

To assess the clinical relevance of these marginal factors, we studied 41 unselected PD patients undergoing two consecutive 2 h, 2.27% glucose exchanges, first with 2.5 L and then with 1.5 L.

RESULTS

IPP, higher in the 2.5 L exchange, had a wide interpatient range, was higher in obese and polycystic patients and their increase with infusion volume was higher for women regardless of body size. UF with 2.5 L correlated inversely with IPP and was higher for patients with polycystosis or hernias, while for 1.5 L we found no significant correlations. The effluent had higher glucose and osmolarity in the 2.5 L exchange than in the 1.5 L one, similar for both sexes. In spite of this stronger osmotic gradient, only 21 patients had more UF in the 2.5 L exchange, with differences up to 240 mL. The other 20 patients had more UF in the 1.5 L exchange, with stronger differences (up to 800 mL, and more than 240 mL for 9 patients). The second group, with similar effluent osmolarity and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) parameters than the first, has higher IPP and preponderance of men. The sex influence is so intense that men decreased average UF with 2.5 L with respect to 1.5 L, while women increased it.

CONCLUSIONS

With 2.27% glucose, sex and IPP-modulated by obesity, polycystosis, hernias, and intraperitoneal volume-significantly affect UF in clinical settings and might be useful for its management.

摘要

背景

腹膜透析(PD)中的超滤(UF)主要由渗透梯度和腹膜通透性驱动,但其他因素,如腹腔内压(IPP),也有影响。

方法

为了评估这些边缘因素的临床相关性,我们研究了 41 名未经选择的 PD 患者,他们连续进行了两次 2 小时、2.27%葡萄糖交换,第一次用 2.5 L,然后用 1.5 L。

结果

IPP 在 2.5 L 交换中更高,个体间差异很大,在肥胖和多囊患者中更高,并且无论体型大小,女性的 IPP 随输注量的增加幅度更高。2.5 L 的 UF 与 IPP 呈负相关,多囊症或疝气患者的 UF 更高,而对于 1.5 L,我们没有发现明显的相关性。2.5 L 交换的流出液中葡萄糖和渗透压更高,无论性别如何,这两种交换的结果相似。尽管存在更强的渗透梯度,但只有 21 名患者在 2.5 L 交换中获得了更多的 UF,差异高达 240 毫升。另外 20 名患者在 1.5 L 交换中获得了更多的 UF,差异更大(高达 800 毫升,9 名患者超过 240 毫升)。第二组患者与第一组患者的流出液渗透压和腹膜平衡试验(PET)参数相似,但 IPP 更高,男性居多。性别的影响非常强烈,男性在 2.5 L 时 UF 比 1.5 L 减少,而女性则增加。

结论

在 2.27%葡萄糖水平下,性别和 IPP(受肥胖、多囊症、疝气和腹腔内体积调节)在临床环境中显著影响 UF,这可能有助于其管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验