Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2279-2287. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32752. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Although rituximab-based high-dose therapy is frequently used in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT), data supporting the benefits are not available. Herein, we report the impact of rituximab-based conditioning on auto-HCT outcomes in patients who have DLBCL.
Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry, 862 adult DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HCT between 2003 and 2017 using BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) conditioning regimen were included. All patients received frontline rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy and had chemosensitive disease pre-HCT. Early chemoimmunotherapy failure was defined as not achieving complete remission (CR) after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or relapse within 1 year of initial diagnosis. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).
The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: BEAM (n = 667) and R-BEAM (n = 195). On multivariate analysis, no significant difference was seen in OS (P = .83) or progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .61) across the 2 cohorts. No significant association between the use of rituximab and risk of relapse (P = .15) or nonrelapse mortality (P = .12) was observed. Variables independently associated with lower OS included older age at auto-HCT (P < .001), absence of CR at auto-HCT (P < .001) and early chemoimmunotherapy failure (P < .001). Older age (P < .0002) and non-CR pre-HCT (P < .0001) were also associated with inferior PFS. There was no significant difference in early infectious complications between the 2 cohorts.
In this large registry analysis of DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HCT, the addition of rituximab to the BEAM conditioning regimen had no impact on transplantation outcomes. Older age, absence of CR pre auto-HCT, and early chemoimmunotherapy failure were associated with inferior survival.
虽然利妥昔单抗为基础的大剂量化疗经常用于接受自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 患者,但尚无获益数据支持。在此,我们报告了利妥昔单抗为基础的预处理对 DLBCL 患者 auto-HCT 结果的影响。
使用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心 (CIBMTR) 登记处,纳入了 2003 年至 2017 年间接受 BEAM(卡氮芥、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、马法兰)预处理方案的 862 例接受 auto-HCT 的成人 DLBCL 患者。所有患者均接受一线含利妥昔单抗的化疗免疫治疗,且在 HCT 前有化疗敏感疾病。早期化疗免疫治疗失败定义为一线化疗免疫治疗后未达到完全缓解 (CR) 或初始诊断后 1 年内复发。主要结局是总生存 (OS)。
研究队列分为 2 组:BEAM 组 (n=667) 和 R-BEAM 组 (n=195)。多变量分析显示,两组之间 OS (P=0.83) 或无进展生存 (PFS) (P=0.61) 无显著差异。未观察到利妥昔单抗的使用与复发风险 (P=0.15) 或非复发相关死亡率 (P=0.12) 之间存在显著关联。与 OS 较低独立相关的变量包括 auto-HCT 时年龄较大 (P<0.001)、auto-HCT 时未达到 CR (P<0.001) 和早期化疗免疫治疗失败 (P<0.001)。年龄较大 (P<0.0002) 和 HCT 前未达到 CR (P<0.0001) 也与较差的 PFS 相关。两组之间早期感染并发症无显著差异。
在这项接受 auto-HCT 的 DLBCL 患者的大型登记分析中,在 BEAM 预处理方案中添加利妥昔单抗对移植结局没有影响。年龄较大、HCT 前未达到 CR 和早期化疗免疫治疗失败与生存较差相关。