Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):572-588. doi: 10.1177/1745691619897966. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
In recent years, the number of studies examining mind wandering has increased considerably, and research on the topic has spread widely across various domains of psychological research. Athough the term has been used to refer to various cognitive states, researchers typically operationalize mind wandering in terms of (TUT). Research on TUT has shed light on the various task features that require people's attention and on the consequences of task inattention. Important methodological and conceptual complications do persist, however, in current investigations of TUT. We argue that these complications may be dampening the development of a more nuanced scientific account of TUT. In this article, we outline three of the more prominent methodological and conceptual complications in the literature on TUT and discuss potential directions for researchers to take as they move forward in their investigations of TUT.
近年来,研究思维漫游的数量大幅增加,该主题的研究已经广泛传播到心理学研究的各个领域。虽然该术语曾被用于指代各种认知状态,但研究人员通常根据任务切换(TUT)来操作化思维漫游。关于 TUT 的研究揭示了各种需要人们注意的任务特征以及任务不注意的后果。然而,在当前对 TUT 的研究中,仍然存在重要的方法学和概念上的复杂性。我们认为,这些复杂性可能会阻碍对 TUT 进行更细致的科学解释的发展。在本文中,我们概述了 TUT 文献中三个更为突出的方法学和概念上的复杂性,并讨论了研究人员在进一步研究 TUT 时可以采取的潜在方向。