Jeon Kibum, Kim Miyoung, Lee Jiwon, Lee Jee-Soo, Kim Han-Sung, Kang Hee Jung, Lee Young Kyung
Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19096. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019096.
The assessment of bone marrow thrombopoietic activity in patients with thrombocytopenia is necessary to achieve an accurate diagnosis and administer effective treatment. We evaluated the discriminatory power of the immature platelet fraction (IPF) in differentiating hyperdestructive/consumptive thrombocytopenia from hypoproductive thrombocytopenia and its potential use as a predictive marker for platelet recovery.
In this observational study, platelet indices, including IPF, were measured in 105 healthy individuals, 27 patients with hyperdestructive/consumptive thrombocytopenia (all with immune thrombocytopenic purpura [ITP]), and 35 patients with hypoproductive thrombocytopenia (5 with aplastic anemia and 30 with cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy) using a Sysmex XN-3000 hematology analyzer.
The platelet distribution width, mean platelet volume, platelet large cell ratio, IPF, and absolute immature platelet count (AIPC) were significantly higher in the hyperdestructive/consumptive thrombocytopenia group than in the hypoproductive thrombocytopenia group (P < .001). The IPF showed the highest difference between the two patient groups (200%). Receiver operating characteristics analysis that showed the IPF had the largest area under the curve among all the platelet indices analyzed; its cut-off value was 2.3%. The IPF decreased 3 to 4 days in advance of platelet count elevation in patients with ITP, whereas the delta AIPC increased 3 days in advance. Furthermore, the IPF and delta AIPC increased 5.5 days and 8.5 days, respectively, before platelet counts increased up to 130.0 × 10/L in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
These data demonstrated that the IPF and delta AIPC are both excellent indicators of the etiology of thrombocytopenia and predictive markers for platelet recovery.
评估血小板减少症患者的骨髓血小板生成活性对于准确诊断和实施有效治疗至关重要。我们评估了未成熟血小板分数(IPF)在区分高破坏性/消耗性血小板减少症与低生成性血小板减少症方面的鉴别能力及其作为血小板恢复预测标志物的潜在用途。
在这项观察性研究中,使用Sysmex XN - 3000血液分析仪对105名健康个体、27名高破坏性/消耗性血小板减少症患者(均为免疫性血小板减少性紫癜[ITP])和35名低生成性血小板减少症患者(5名再生障碍性贫血患者和30名正在接受化疗的癌症患者)进行了包括IPF在内的血小板指标测量。
高破坏性/消耗性血小板减少症组的血小板分布宽度、平均血小板体积、血小板大细胞比率、IPF和绝对未成熟血小板计数(AIPC)显著高于低生成性血小板减少症组(P <.001)。IPF在两组患者之间显示出最大差异(200%)。受试者工作特征分析表明,IPF在所有分析的血小板指标中曲线下面积最大;其临界值为2.3%。ITP患者的IPF在血小板计数升高前3至4天下降,而AIPC差值提前3天升高。此外,在接受化疗且血小板计数升至130.0×10⁹/L之前,癌症患者的IPF和AIPC差值分别提前5.5天和8.5天升高。
这些数据表明,IPF和AIPC差值均是血小板减少症病因的优秀指标以及血小板恢复的预测标志物。