Suppr超能文献

前置胎盘管理中宫内双球囊填塞术与纱布填塞法的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验

Intrauterine double-balloon tamponade vs gauze packing in the management of placenta previa: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Wei Jing, Dai Yimin, Wang Zhiqun, Gu Ning, Ju Hongfang, Xu Youdi, Xu Biyun, Hu Yali

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Affiliated to Nantong University, Taizhou.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019221.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a newly designed intrauterine double-balloon catheter to arrest postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD) for placenta previa.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial in two referral centers and one general hospital. Women with continuous bleeding after placental delivery following CD for placenta previa, who failed to respond to uterotonics, suturing and uterine devascularization, and in the absence of suspected deeply invasive accreta were eligible subjects. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive intrauterine double-balloon catheter (n = 102) or gauze packing (n = 102). The main outcome was the rate of successful hemostasis without the need for additional surgical interventions. The secondary outcomes included the volume of blood loss during and after CD, the rate of PPH, incidence and amount of blood transfusion, hysterectomy, surgical complications, intensive care unit admission, need for re-laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and readmission.

RESULTS

The 224 participants were recruited before delivery, with 20 excluded (14 cases bleeding stopped after uterotonics and/or local myometrium sutures and 6 patients with placental increta). Finally, 102 women were assigned in catheter group and 102 others in gauze group. There was no difference in the rate of successful hemostasis in the catheter and gauze groups (93.1% vs 91.2%, P = .80). Compared with those in the gauze group, women in the catheter group showed significantly less blood loss within 24 hours postpartum (895 [612.3-1297.8] vs 1156 [882.5-1453.3] ml, P < .01), lower rate of PPH ≥1000 ml (42.2% vs 63.7%, P < .01). Accordingly, women in the catheter group had significantly less maternal adverse events such as postpartum anemia, puerperal morbidity, and postpartum pain.

CONCLUSION

Uterine tamponade using a double-balloon catheter was as effective as gauze packing in hemostasis, and appeared to be superior in reducing postpartum blood loss and pain following CD for placenta previa. Using double-balloon catheter in managing PPH in this situation may be a preferable alternative to minimize maternal morbidity.

摘要

背景

评估一种新设计的宫内双球囊导管用于剖宫产(CD)后前置胎盘产后出血(PPH)的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们在两个转诊中心和一家综合医院进行了一项开放标签、多中心随机对照试验。因前置胎盘行剖宫产术后胎盘娩出后持续出血,对宫缩剂、缝合及子宫血管结扎无反应且无可疑深部侵袭性胎盘植入的女性为合格受试者。合格受试者被随机分为接受宫内双球囊导管治疗组(n = 102)或纱布填塞组(n = 102)。主要结局是无需额外手术干预即可成功止血的比率。次要结局包括剖宫产术中及术后的失血量、PPH发生率、输血发生率及输血量、子宫切除术、手术并发症、重症监护病房入住率、再次剖腹手术需求、住院时间及再次入院情况。

结果

224名参与者在分娩前被招募,20名被排除(14例宫缩剂和/或局部子宫肌层缝合后出血停止,6例胎盘植入患者)。最终,102名女性被分配到导管组,102名被分配到纱布组。导管组和纱布组的成功止血率无差异(93.1%对91.2%,P = 0.80)。与纱布组相比,导管组女性产后24小时内失血量显著减少(895[612.3 - 1297.8]对1156[882.5 - 1453.3]ml,P < 0.01),PPH≥1000ml的发生率较低(42.2%对63.7%,P < 0.01)。因此,导管组女性产后贫血、产褥病率和产后疼痛等母体不良事件显著较少。

结论

使用双球囊导管进行子宫压迫止血在止血方面与纱布填塞一样有效,并且在减少前置胎盘剖宫产术后的产后失血量和疼痛方面似乎更具优势。在这种情况下使用双球囊导管处理PPH可能是减少母体发病率的更优选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaaf/7035072/43df3257fab2/medi-99-e19221-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验